Search results

  1. K

    good stand alone platforms (no brokerage necessary)

    Thanks everyone! I will look further into those suggestions. For those of you who suggested demo accounts. If you are receiving data, aren't those "free trial" demos for a limited time. I probably would need to call around and talk with some of these platform providers. Seems too good to be...
  2. K

    good stand alone platforms (no brokerage necessary)

    I have a friend who is not a US citizen, but is in school and interested in getting into algorithmic system development. He really needs to start getting direct interactions in live markets and getting his feet wet writing code for some algo trading system back testing and even just getting...
  3. K

    Does my DOM suck?

    Thanks for the suggestion. Do they have the capability to split the bid and ask order flow data? Do they let you bring up earler composites of that data?
  4. K

    Does my DOM suck?

    That's what I want to find out. From what I can see comparing my ToS platform to what it looks like Jigsaw had to offer, these are the differences. ToS seems to have a limited range where orders are shown (like maybe 10 ticks worth of order data in either direction). this just shifts up or...
  5. K

    Does my DOM suck?

    I'm glad you brought up Jigsaw. This was the webinar guy's DOM of choice. Is it something that can run on its own, or does it need to link up to a brokerage. I otherwise really like thinkorswim. Their charts are very nice and I have grown accustomed to the "thinkscript" so I can write my own...
  6. K

    Does my DOM suck?

    I've been looking into using depth of market ladders to support the execution decisions for my trades (I focus on futures markets). I currently use thinkorswim which does have a ladder and level II but after watching some webinars on the subject, I'm getting the impression the DOM I am getting...
  7. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    apologies. I lumped you in with the conversation that seemed to be focused on "edge" equating to unfair advantage. When I started the thread I was looking more to discuss the advantage you get though skill, research or statistical analysis. Good old "wholesome" edge :-)
  8. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    SMH I really want to change the title of this thread. "hey profitable discretionary traders, why do you think you will continue to be profitable"
  9. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    Ok, I see. This all really does come down to semantics. For me there are two approaches to trading discretionary and non discretionary. Both are based in interpreting price and volume or some derivative of them. With non discretionary you are blindly following signals that you have back...
  10. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    @Redneck ....well you're an abrasive SOB, aren't you. (Not that I don't appreciate the response). Look, I actually don't think we have schemas for markets/ trading that are so different. You say "manual" trading .... I say "discretionary". You say the 3 layers are mechanical, discretionary...
  11. K

    Optimization and Walk-Forward

    You can write back testing code to account for all kinds of things. My partner and I would factor in closing trades on Friday, closing trades before contract roll, or even block out periods where you would only follow the system during certain hours. Yes, there will be uncertainty inside the...
  12. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    ok, right. I need to stop using the word "edge" because I am being misinterpreted. What I really mean to discuss is why a trader thinks they can win over time. Unless you can define why you are a profitable trader, I'm pretty sure your days are numbered. As a discretionary trader, I am...
  13. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    Well, that's a bit jaded, yes? On a forum for retail traders, you are basically saying retail traders don't have a chance.
  14. K

    Optimization and Walk-Forward

    This book is excellent. The Evaluation and Optimization of Trading Strategies by Robert Pardo It provides a great schema for understanding systems trading and how to properly backtest, the difference between overfitting and optimization, and how to run a walk-forward test. In addition it...
  15. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    Indeed. This was not meant to be an example of the kind of discretionary trade I would do on a regular basis. (There was no technical context which gave me any frame work to make it). It was just something anomalous I did for fun, but did demonstrate the importance I see in setting up...
  16. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    Well, in the direction I intend to go in as a trader I plan to disregard any fundamentals and only build context technically. That is a decision based on the fact that I submit to the reality as a retail participant I DON'T know the fundamental factors. I can only build a hypotheses based on...
  17. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    This is my generic way of saying: what is the big picture (long time frame ----> intraday)? What is the underlying status of the "auction"? What are my hypotheses for what will happen next?
  18. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    Well yes..... "edge" is a little silly. However, when there is a discussion about knowing what your's is as a trader, the context holds more water. I think it is really important for a trader to understand SPECIFICALLY WHY they think they will win a zero sum game with consistancy. As I...
  19. K

    defining "edge" with discretionary trading

    I am a developing trader who is just coming out of a phase of experimenting with algorithmic non-discretionary trading. With that approach, knowing what your edge is can be directly quantified with proper back testing. Since then I have abandoned systems trading because I became frustrated...
  20. K

    Proper back and forward testing

    I did read that article the other day. I having trouble assimilating the difference between what I see in the chart above and what is depicted in the article. Both fall apart..... one recovers, the other does not. Perhaps the difference is in the expected volatility of returns. The drawdown...
Back
Top