Search results

In the final chart, 1.5, Under , " The universe has not always existed," I would insert, "Our universe is a component of a larger system that we can never examine, nor understand it's nature." Anti-Madder

Ok, trainr. So if you multiply a given mass by the square of the speed of light, you could say that you, "did the math" that equates energy and mass. But what you really did was perform simple multiplication. Einstein did the math that led to that astounding formula so the rest of us can drop...

And, No, you did not. You did no such thing. You did not do the math required to calculate this. To achieve the result you claim to have attained requires a knowledge of physics as well as the mathematical skill to "legally" perform a large array of biased tweaks within the equations. The...

I am not taking the bait! No! I just can't help it. Ok, even though, these questions look like a passage written by Lewis Carroll, I just can't stop. In the context of relativity Time is not a, "thing" that has properties. All matter expresses energy ultimately through it's...

It's clear that you were attempting to spread someone else's truth. You are... well, an apostle I guess. Have you ever overheard someone who was clueless about trading yammer to someone else like they knew what they're saying? Do you crack up at their misnomers and mal-aprops, knowing...

Yes, very Little. trainr, You should understand how cosmic variance imposes crippling constraints on the results of some equations before you claim such degree of accuracy as to be within a few thousand years. When we begin calculations that encompass all that ever existed in all time...