Search results

What about NAV erosion in many of them

Because of hype of high Div but ignoring NAV erosion

The big problems is NAV erosion no body talks about many you tubers promoting XDTE for dividend income only ,also in downmarket what will happen!

Only total return and associated risk counts for the rational investor. yes agree

AUM is there

Found this video showing the risk,,, but people will fall for it

Lot of you tubers promoting QDTE,XDTE Etfs for their high dividend yields but hardly they talk about NAV erosion Also something about "Return of Capital" tax treatment as compared to dividend income! What I don't understand is 1) If the total div yield is not more that the NAV erosion then...

Yes true,, but there are enough gullible people out there to support this "Industry" Real props don't do this BS about Tets fee hamster , and to make matters worst "OTC product / CFD" based firm has additional red flag, the broker they used mainly is Market Maker model so clear conflict of...

What happens if after getting assigned after first time you holding the underlying and then overnight underlying tanks in a very very bad way ?

It may not be 100% Ponzi but the main point is the business Model is based on Failure and Not success ( 10000 of test fee V/s paying out only few) It is like Tesla or google charging those engineers wanting to get a job charging $1000 fee millions apply as these are god reputable companies...

PRo is still SIm so where does the wining traders get paid? Hamster wheel fees

Is it unethical that they payout a lot of traders with the income from losing traders fees? It is not ethical because then the real motive is more failed traders on a hamster wheel than more good traders, and when I say real prop firms I mean real big one who don't advertise for Traders or sell...

Table can turn on you also, you could be one of those thousands who loos the TEST fee ... very unethical business model, True prop firms don;t need these gimmicks

These companies aren't charities I am not saying they should be but "paying from failed traders fees" is a recipe for so many "firms" going out of business, the Bmodel is good for the firm but sucks for the trader , REAL prop firms ( regulated) hunt trading talent at own cost... not by this...

TST put in to SIM so how do they pay? from failed traders, and they are also not regulated as Broker dealer so no scrutiny , Earn2Trade had a bad reputation when CFTC took action now they are not in USA

ok which one? that you think is reputable and actually trades real money on a regulated exchange

I certainly would only pick on in the futures business ,one that does actually provide a live account Which one?

This will go on 1) As long as there are enough rabbits who will go for the carrot 2) as long as regulators are sleeping 3) Until all of a sudden many "Funded traders start winning and the "firm" can't manage the risk they are taking ( Since it seem they don't take the trades to real market ) Now...

The entire thing.... Black Box

But here the Option Collar is either established or not achieved on day 1 , it is not like the USO which was just a futures position I am not saying that this is a great product ,