Search results

joethemoustache wrote: >Windows source code stolen!! >Is this an issue? Could it lead to security problems? >http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/intern...e.ap/index.html >The code is from Win2k and NT4 Maybe someone could actually fix it.

harrytrader wrote: > time, as for my equations is in fact an illusion or one can say that time is an artefact that comes from movement or activity. Yes, time is defined as the direction of increasing entropy. Now why do we remember (have memories of) the past and not the future? :p...

The following proves my point: http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?program=News-CSC&command=view&id=1694 "The publisher Michigan State University Press submitted the book to a rigorous peer-review process that included reviews by an Ivy-league professor of biological...

slowtrend wrote: > http://www.darwinismanddesign.com/ If it quacks like a quack ... it's a quack!! These discovery.org guys remind me of a psychiatrist from Harvard I heard once who believes some of his patients were actually abducted by extraterrestials. He's a quack too.

50 cent wrote: >If you're sitting in a prop firm office you're asking for trouble. It's >much better to trade remote, if for some reason you're hooked >on going prop. You can trade proprietary in an office or remote. You can trade individually (retail) in an office or remote. It wasn't...

harrytrader wrote: > As said here I showed an example of Backwardation of the > market in the PAST: ... If there is retrocausality http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9406028 then there should be something analogous to the EPR experiment (where Bell's inequalities are violated). Do you...

harrytrader wrote: Evolution = Natural Selection + Pyramid Forces Everybody knows THAT. :p :p :p

harrytrader wrote: I think I'm as offended by Jaynes goofy subjectivism as I am by the creationist/ID quacks. :p

Thunderdog wrote: > Physics is a pure science - a hard science. The study of markets > is a soft "science" - a social "science." A lot of econophysics (e.g. quantum theory or chaos theory applied to markets) seems like quackery to me. Probably is. But quants (mathematicians) doing...

nononsense wrote: > Please straighten out your "Pi theorem" figuring prominently in > your "mysticism" thread from a week ago. Among your > mountain of published stuff, this is something we all can at > least verify as being nonsense. You can't afford not to correct > this. Should we...

harrytrader wrote: > Book Review : "A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market" > When a mathematician plays stock market it's a catastrophe or > rather he is just another Irving Fisher because not all > mathematicians should be alike ...

easyrider wrote: > ... the candles were different on all three... The atoms of finance are tick data: each market transaction is time stamped. So one must look there to see how [O,C.H.L] data is derived.

Fast_Trader wrote: The question was given anthony_trader has traded to an account of $250000, can he trade for a living full-time. Maybe that would answer the question.

anthony_trader: > i'd just like to thank everyone for their responses. Since you have provided us this http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=415051 can you post a copy of your trading transactions over the past three years? Thanks.

Harry123: > There are gems in this thread ... Can you list them concisely? Then we can throw away all else and focus on them.

Speakingout: > ... I am posting for my friend ... The mystery is why "Anthony" cannot type but needs Speakingout to interact with the forum.

Speakingout: >Hi everybody I just read the additional replies to this thread >since last night. After reading them I have some interesting >thoughts of my own since I won't be talking with my friend until >mid afternoon. >What I am starting to get the feeling from the last number of...

Speakingout: >This reply comes from my friend and not from me. I am only >typing it in for him. He has me on the phone. He has enjoyed all >the replies so far and they have been helpful and appreciated. brokerj: >this has reached the point of absurdity... Anybody got the >number for...

pspr wrote: > Harry, you need to find yourself a good shrink. Here's a suggestion: http://skepdic.com/jung.html Except he's dead. I guess it doesn't matter.

cosmic wrote: Yes, I believe so. If it were published or reverse engineered.