Search results

I know a lot of women who argue so much better that they'd be offended by the comparision. :D Fact is, candle doesn't argue. He smears; he distorts. And he never responds in kind to serious argumentation. Instead he responds with childish taunts and bombast. It's not even close to...

>ROFL... what a stupid creature... only on his 4th post using another new of his many trolling multiple nicks (I got a good idea who you are, but I won't embarass your meager brain in public)... Oh please. Embarrass away -- that is if you think you're up to it. But I'd advise you to be...

candle sez: >>You guys ARE amusing, I will give ya that... but its a real tragedy to see how intellectually-challenged you are... oh well, some people have the brains and others don't... that's the way it's always been... Whew. Does anybody read this guy? I mean . . . more than once...

>>It's my real first name. Not even a nick.<< >Perhaps that is so Lance. But it does make one wonder when one sees someone, who has only just joined this chat site, come up with such strong opnions which are so contrary to the majority of contributors. I read one contributor. I replied...

It's my real first name. Not even a nick. The quality of your reply exposes you for who you are. No need to reply again. I'm finished with you. No challenge, I'm afraid. :eek:

candletrader sez: Let us begin with the assumption that Iraq is cleared by the majority of the Security Council of the possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs). Pretty unlikely assumption, but okay, let's run with that for a second or two. Then he goes on to say: Let us also...