Search results

Well Xpurt I don't understand the point of your comment. As far as I can tell, we aren't related in any way, nor do we work together and clearly your not a neighbor of mine.....frankly I don't feel obligated to convince you of anything. Furthermore, in this age of the Internet, one can...

Xpurt Well someone has a short term memory problem Here is the quote you disclaim making "Like the OP said, you'll not find shrinks in successful trading rooms." Clearly you endorse this statement, you typed it... Simply put, you're wrong....Clearly there are skilled professionals...

You seem to have wandered away from the point. You indicated that you didn't know of any psychologists who worked with successful trading offices. I do.....and I listed them for your consideration. If you have it all figured out (and it seems you do) theres no reason to even consider it...

Interesting that with so many years of experience the previous poster hasn't kept up with current events. Dr. Brett Steenbarger does quite a bit of consulting with successful professional offices. Dr. Ari Kiev has worked for my firm and I know of others including Mark Douglas (admittedly...

All data displayed on the screen is in the past, and since the bid/ask footprint is a record of all participants no "criminal" can affect the display of what actually traded. So apparently now there is a trio of village idiots Sorry OP I was wrong. But look at it this way, at least now...

Unfortunately sir you seem to have encountered this site's two village idiots. MarketDelta is a commercial product that produces a "footprint" of the volume at bid vs ask. It is expensive but does all the work for you.. Alternatively Linnsoft has charting software that approximates those...

The problem with discussing the impact of psychology is that one needs some context, or framework from with to judge. In whatever field of endeavor you participate, try to make acquaintance with ONE skilled person and you will see what I mean. As an example I have walked around a golf...

I am sorry sir, I have no idea of what you are saying. Forgive me please. And I think my English gets in the way of my thought process. To be clear, by "initiative" activity I mean that the participant "lifts the offer"...Buyer accepts the offer and pays up. in contrast, "responsive"...

I have a bit of time here before I get back to work A couple of things that might help people interested in working with volume First to the gentleman to started the thread, I say you are generous in providing that kind of direction to retail traders. Secondly althought cumulative...

This is simply ignorance characteristic of retail traders. on the other hand Jennie, you are asking someone to give you an edge and that is of itself rather amusing. Hard to tell which of you is the funnier comedian. The times when a participant can "count on" a move of .2 in spy...

This is quite an unusual website. I wouldn't have believed that this much mis-information (not to mention plain ignorance) existed in one place until I saw it with my own eyes. My vantage point is from the other side of the pond. I trade in London. What I can say is that many if not all...

quite a lot of repartee and little about trading So if the idea of losing correctly has merit, I would be interested in know what exactly that is. I'd like to know how losing "correctly" adds value to my trading Thanks