Search results

doesn't sound like much of a 'bot' to me if it's getting killed. 'bots' need to be robust if they are to be worth a damn.

How about me? Where's my thanks? I helped you too! :-(

You can run multiple dual cards in NT4. My NT4 is drivin' two Matrox G450's (dual cards) over four nineteen inchers with no problems whatsoever. Runs like a charm. Easiest thing I ever installed. However, I have no idea 'bout Appian though... Bucky Lee

Wirehead, Did you have any trouble installing the new drivers? Did you have to uninstall the existing drivers before installing the new? What's that DualHead PageWrap and PageLog all about? Is it useful? Bucky Lee

I'm having such a good time I gotta pinch myself every few minutes just to be sure it's notta dream :-D

In the Matrox software in my computer... Do you wanna come over and take a look...:-) Bucky Lee

sasha, NO PROBLEM. The Matrox software has BUILT IN PRESETS for a three monitor config. I just checked. You can spread your desktop over three monitors or four...your choice. Bucky Lee

uptick, The G450's install like a dream. When I installed my second G450 (PCI) and fired that mother up, I expected having to freak around to get it to work properly (first G450,AGP from factory). The smile on my face was four miles wide 60 secs later everything was installed and running...

Add another G450 (be sure it's PCI) for little over $100. Then you can add two more monitors when you so desire. The 450's combine seamlessly. That wasn't too hard to figure out was it?

"I am at ease. No matter what kind of proof you provide he won't believe it. This argument is a waste of time anyway. He should shut up and get a proof himself. LOL, You probably don't know what "proof" is... And here I am asking you for it. Sorry, cesko, I didn't realize you don't...

Tharp, You make the grand assertion that any random system can heavily outperform the market... and when I ask for proof you tell me go read a book or buy a pamphlet from your dad??? I'm not surprised you had nothing to show us... Ed Seykota, Tom Basso, Paul Tudor Jones, Richard...

Cesko, We are not talking here about cutting losses or shorting, etc.... Of course I know of these things. :eek: If you re-read the preceding posts maybe you can figure it out. :confused: Also, you sound like one of those "I just know it's so" kind of guys. :( PS I know that...

Sorry Cesko, But proof needs something a bit more substantial than your say so or limited personal experience. Tharp made a bold assertion that I would like to see him back up with fact. However, I doubt he can come up with anything substantive.

tharp, I challenge you to back up with supported proof your assertions that totally random systems "out performs the market heavily". I can't wait to see it. Bucky Lee

Granted, we are a motley crue, but a likeable lot :-D Bucky Lee

Fohat, I reiterate Datek's reply for your edification and because you didn't get it the first time around: "Daytrading requires margin. Daytrading in a cash account is governed by the free riding clause of Regulation T. No NASD member firm shall permit a customer (other than a...

AAA, Are you suggesting you get instant updated buying power...no wait until tomorrow to refresh??? I find that a little hard to believe. I'm not questioning your veracity only that you may misinterpreting what you are seeing. Bucky Lee

duff, I couldn't agree with you more. It's really quite clear except to a few (one?) Man, this topic has been driven so far into the ground we should be striken' oil! Fohat, Your semantical arguments don't feed the bulldog. The correct interpretation of the regs don't allow...

AAA, What do you mean you just watched BP go down and return to beginning days figure? Do you have to wait for next day to refresh your buying power? Can you describe with more detail what you are permitted to do? Bucky Lee

Sally, Your argument correctly outlines the regulatory prohibitions concerning daytrading a cash account. Yoda, You seem to suggest a rebuttal to Sally's argument but you have not succeeded. Fohat, Get a life man. Your arguments are wrong, semantical and redundant. Let's get...