Search results

Lol.... you sound like a committed lefty with a smear agenda... to be execute to the end... msnbc Rachel Madoww ... kind of type

We haven't decided price structure or any monetization mechanism. It comes with its own language compiled 64bits native with THE SAME optimizations found in a C++ Optimized Compiler. What this means is this: the fastest you can get. One interesting aspect that can be different and I haven't...

Our mission is not to provide you with strategies, but to provide you with the fastest platform your hardware can yield.

As you said: YOUR BELIEVE. This is not a fact. This is a "weak" argument... asking VB.NET programmers compare to C# programmers... may yeild similar result. And by the way the people that will answer like that they know C#, but may not know C++. Never ever .NET will have the variety of...

I don't disagree with you. But most of the people jumped here on the technical side of it with pseudo-science, talking-points, shallow analysis and esoterism. .NET is not good enough for engine/plumbing code and it can be good enough for UI/graphics. I'm an engineer and not a trader and most of...

I don't know if some of you know that lot methods in the Object class are implemented in C++ and not in .NET itself.( source file ecall.cpp/comobject.cpp on the Shared Source CLI ). The main reason is because C++ is faster. In the system namespace along I found close to 200 methods of the...

Tom, Most of the successful traders I met in person or by phone/email weren't the best programmers in the world. Most of them knew nothing about programing, but they have the best ideas. And I mean really really good ideas ... out there.. far away from mainstream. Most often than not the...

Tom, AOT and JIT are brothers and they can't compete with the C++ optimized compiler. I don't doubt that most AOT/JIT share the same source code for most of what they do. Native C++ optimized code will be always faster than native jittered .NET code. Because the jittered code is bloated...

I'm gonna answer the bottom part first: I'm not a talented trader. I hate to lose money and therefore this makes me busy almost 24 hours a day. It feels like 3 fulltime jobs. About writing strategies, I'm not good at it either.... I always try to stick to the existing stuff.. I'm a big fan a...

I'm gonna write in bullet points style( can i say bullet points? or is this language aggressive? :) ) .NET and mostly anything else will make it for a good and cheap UI. I will venture to say .NET is great for UI... e.g charts. Flash too :)[ I have some "insider" information that the fastest...

Steve, they are converted. Here is a example of 2 loops, NOT ONE BUT 2 UNRELATED LOOPS, gone... only a simple assembler instruction. Return value for integer functions are stored in EAX in _cdecl calls( actually in most calls ). As you can image and LeeD you got it right at first....not sure...

LeeD, I read the whole thing and I got a clear understanding of what happened. Now that I know you are technically savvy( I don't know by how much ), I think you should be smart enough to don't allow the loop to go away( that produces brain damage on the .NET fanatics ). If you have...

This is mental gymnastics... global warming. Can you SHOW THE PROOF with that example i posted? You can't... because in that case there is no "loop condition optimization" <= another esoteric phrase Welcome to the jungle. There is not such loop optimization in the loops. C++ generated code...

Hey NetTecture, Don't take this so personal... Can you explain why this bother you so much? Is it affecting your business? You have to ACCEPT THE FACTS. Based on your reasoning... if you put more code inside the loop somehow a magic will make C# faster.... are you serious? Let's see...

Here are 2 program doing the same: looping and adding numbers. One in C++ and one in C#. I was forced to tell the C++ Compiler to downgrade the optimizations. The compiler settings of C++ program has "function inlining" disabled because it was too fast( I'm not kidding ). Note that this is...

€ You are absolutely right. But some posts cannot remain unanswered because they perpetuate some untrue facts that requires clarification. A question I have for mostly traders: how do you guys feel about the idea of sharing with other users the result of your calculations (not your...

These are all great points. And you have mentioned several problems that have cost the hair to more than a score of engineer and traders. And while my hair is still there I can tell you that these are the problems that are keeping me awake.

It looks like you love the phrase: "if you can't convince them... confuse them"... :) Don't tell me you don't like that phrase!! :) I really appreciate that you keep the exchange...And this is not personal... But I want to point out about the quality of your posts. They are like the beef loin...

I didn't know that everybody here knows assembler... I think you are stretching a little bit :) Any way these were the fastest instructions at the moment for double operations. In addition to that the data was as double in memory. Any other pre-conversion of doubles to then try to use the...

You have a good imagination... But no, I wasn't... But even if I was, it illustrates clearly the case that fattened, full of high-fructose-corn-syrup .NET jittered code is bad for your health :D What I said could mean other things too :)