Search results

There are a few in ET who would deny Evolution as being a fact to the point where gravity is required to become a belief system too. Some human-dudes-in-denial clearly still have some way to go before they can evolve beyond belief.

Genesis 1 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. ...then God was an ape. .... according to Genesis, a bisexual ape. Only chromosome 2 and a few million years of evolution away from being risen as an evolved human...

Common ancestry confirms. Genome substantiates. Humans are risen apes not fallen angels. Religion excuses. Creationism denies.

they more often doubt the existence of god, atheist but don't rule it out either. theist They just don't know. Then they are without god. They don't know, they don't have knowledge of god. In the true Greek etymology, 'a' without knowledge without god - atheist. Not agnostic...

That is the definition of a theist. "Not made your mind up".Period ..... must be atheist. You are without ('a'-theist) what is defined as theist. "Not sure of a deity but think there could be one"........ is theist. It's one of the things a theist is. You aren't a little bit theist...

Were someone to describe - the bleeding obvious - as something dogmatic, systematic and theological, I think first you have to ask yourself, why would someone make such an absurd description.

Lol, you beat me to it :) I thought it would be obvious I totally agree with what you say above. But what is it you don't think is clear about my response that you needed to explain to me? I was initially informed by the ever sweet talking jem in words to the effect : " You’re...

Neither do you.

Is that some Christian thing, calling people a piece of shit over and over? Or a separate serious psychological problem. Probably both. But what you certainly don't have is an argument. The ability for logical reasoning is another thing you don't have. Do you want me to admit to your...

I don't need place faith in any religion and I don't need prove a negative. It's usually only the strangely religious like jem and you who would demand a negative be proved. That's when I simply ask you to prove one too.

No problem :)

READ IT PROPERLY Barth dude!! silver tongued jem says I cannot prove there is no God. Have you heard about proving negatives Barth? If not then I'll just do what he does....and I'll ask you to prove a negative too... I can prove there is no God . You cannot prove I can't. duh!

Your ability to formulate such eloquent thoughts must make your family really proud. I can prove there is no God . You cannot prove I can't. You used some supposed statement of a scientist that has nothing to do with science .

You can't use Nobel laureates to argue - period. You have no argument to begin with. You post what appear to be a few personal thoughts of a prize winner and then from behind it , you seem to believe you have earned some right or have some sort of credibility to call people a piece of...

Out of 809 Nobel Laureates since 1901 only 50 are listed as being associated with religion. That includes those whose association is simply being Jewish! Non of course were awarded the nobel prize for anything whatsoever to do with religion /Creator / God. Using your own childlike...

Your argument? Don’t make me laugh. Your argument is what ? ....that science cannot prove there is not a mischievous little Elf called God wot created a Big Bang. There's no science in it. So what's the point in "quoting" Nobel Prize winners jem? You should realize there are no...

trendlover, Essentially yes, that is what I am saying. That, at least for the sake of intellectual honesty, there is no middle ground. Mithos, This is not hair splitting at all. With respect, you can't substantiate saying, the word 'without' means 'certain in none'. I...

There you go again , predictable as ever. "Hawking, Hoyle, cosmologists, physicists. Nobel Prize winners - for the 50th time" - - as if name dropping will give you some credibility . Your religious beliefs hanging onto the coat tails of science, hoping to steal some of the reflected glow...

We are in agreement. The "don't know/don't care." is what is often deemed to be agnostic, but which I am saying is atheist anyway, because you cannot be a bit without God anymore than a bit pregnant. NO. We just agreed The "a" in front of a greek term means 'without'. So it's without God...

Quote from jem: You have got to be kidding me. So well written and yet so distorted.. Then did it ever occur to you it may well be your own approach that is "so distorted". Quite honestly it should have by now. We do not have to argue that the big bang means something which comes from...