Search results

So yes, really? The non-fact based, non-scientific "science" in question is Creationism. What next. Teach Numerology as math? The Stork theory as biology? Teaching religion as science. A really dumb thing to do.

You're asking what's the problem misleading fifth-graders into even considering myth based creationism should compete with fact based science. Really?

Should you do mainly one thing, I would suggest, then you need not get conflicted, or overly worried about your son getting a skewed view of religion. Or skewed anything else really for that matter. Introduce him to rational skepticism. Show him his natural ability to question and inquire...

"the cause is real education, and not polarizing the public." Are you saying you retract that? Then I suggest you would be doing little else but polarizing. Doing something yourself but accusing others of doing it. I'd say more appropriate to state it was flourishing in secular liberal (small...

In this thread at least, FT does nothing of the kind Hoof. Furthermore, although I've no intention of defending FT, he does a good job of that himself, I've never seen him make any such claims at all. FT said "disseminate the science and eliminate the myth" - that's what he's about. Let me...

In all fairness, you've done a pretty fair job of polarizing. Your attack, which is noticeably made only one way, against what you call leftists, is essentially as insignificant to science as is the intellectually primitive and politically twisted ranting of any righties. Arguing from...

.... and you're no contest. So you'll never know :p

A lawyer repeatedly spelling cite, a key word of the trade, as site !!?? An extra on Law and Order SVU maybe, even that's a stretch. Tell me about it, you're not kidding.

21st century and astounding to read the ways in which the Catholic Church still requires adherence to its Taliban wing.

Lol . Watching the usual crowd of ET crazy hicks fire off might be really funny if it weren't so sad. It's an ad, made by a disaffected Republican, nothing to do with schools, you bunch of knee jerk reactionary loons. So go blame your own for it. Another reminder, as if one were needed...

Let's face it, it's over for you before they even start.

oops...there seems to be a contest for the title.

None. Democratic secular law produces 'the better countries to live in' despite all kinds of religious psychosis.

Conjecture based on math and quantum mechanics cannot sensibly be described as pure speculation. Conjecture based on nought but wishful thinking, intelligent design and creationism for instance, is reasonably described as pure speculation. Or more accurately, blind unfounded guessing.

Not arguably scientific at all. It is scientific. Not pure speculation either, that's just silly. Any hypothesis based on math, quantum physics, as the multiverse is, cannot sensibly be called pure speculation or arguably scientific. And endlessly parroting "the universe appears fine...

....not just for "appearances" though.

You are not making any scientific ones. It doesn't matter. It is not a scientific claim. It doesn't matter. Many of them advance other models which do not invoke a multiverse. If the universe is designed, then one of the of "the very top scientists" states it is designed by gravity...

Nothing you're posting is helping you move away from the ignorant ridiculous non-scientific claims you're always trying to angrily steer toward. Lol, no surprise there then. What you keep attempting to read into all your witless cutting and pasting, isn't the same as what it reads...

Birth control doesn't always work... so what the hell has that to do with anything? Most times for most women it does. Conception is nothing but the act of becoming pregnant. What definition is there to change, unless of course you're trying to confuse yourself in the way you are. Until a...