Search results

And what would know about science? There is no indication at all of any intelligence or knowledge from you. Probably more than Steven Goddard. Because he is not even a real person. Fraud person fraud site.

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these...

And Cook just assembles the science. Real science. As opposed to crap the denier morons refer to. Amazing what the denier morons think is good science.

Judith Curry? LOL While Judith Curry supports the scientific opinion on climate change,[12] she has argued that climatologists should be more accommodating of those skeptical of the scientific consensus on climate change.[12] Favourite climate myths by Judith Curry Below are many of the...

And still the asshole 666 ignores the real reason for the temp adjustments. Amazing. Like he doesn't want you to know. Would spoil the lies. Note: multiple data sets. They closely agree.

Yes jerm, the name Goddard was chosen to help spread disinformation about man made global warming. How about quoting from a reliable source for once you lying POS ?

The deniers have this "Steve Goddard" who is so ashamed he doesn't use his real name and he chose one to confuse it with the Goddard Space Center. A real science source.

Of course jerm isn't really a good Christian at all. Christians don't knowingly lie. If there is a hell....

Probably the best single source for the science of global warming is Skeptical Science. Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook. "Cook is trained as a solar physicist and says he is motivated by his Christian beliefs.[19] He is one of a number of Christians publicly arguing for...

Hey piehole I see you've given up any pretense of being reasonable. You're just another POS liar.

Oh!! Look which liar is back!!! Hey Piehole I thought I sent you off with your tail between your legs last time when I pointed out that your logic is non-existant and all your sources are frauds or incompetents or both.

Who is Steve Goddard again? and why did he choose the pseudonym of "Goddard"?

I guess you'll never admit knowing. It would get in the way of your being a lying sack of shit.

Probably the best single source for the science of global warming is Skeptical Science. Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook. "Cook is trained as a solar physicist and says he is motivated by his Christian beliefs.[19] He is one of a number of Christians publicly arguing for...

Oh I'm sure if you look you can find it. You DO know what google is right? But what you see may cause you cognitive dissonance so you will probably not look.

Who is Steve Goddard again? and why did he choose the pseudonym of "Goddard"?

No, you are spreading lies again, and that makes you fucking piece of shit liar.

We are currently experiencing global warming. If an increased greenhouse effect is a significant part of this warming, we would expect to see nights warming faster than days. There have been a number of studies into this effect, which confirm that this is indeed the case. One study looked at...

Who is Steve Goddard again? and why did he choose the pseudonym of "Goddard"?

and why did he choose the pseudonym of "Goddard"? "When dissonance is present, in addition to trying to reduce it, the person will actively avoid situations and information which would likely increase the dissonance"[1]