Search results

oof... killer post :D Funny how you guys give support by reveling in a self perpetuating ignorance of the issues, just because behind it all you're looking for the same imaginary friend above being at all rational.

Lol. Steady now Jem. Your self projecting is hitting an all time high.

I'm seeing Jem in a whole new light.

You said it. No doubt it was by mistake, but you said it. "fine tuning of our universe".... is conjecture. Well done! Top down cosmology is a (scientific) theory. No kiddin'. Well fancy. That's another one hell of a non-argument you have there.

Very good question fc :)

"The universe’s initial conditions consisted of a superposition of many possible initial conditions, only a small fraction of which contributed to the conditions we see today. According to their theory, it is inevitable that we find our universe’s "fine-tuned" physical constants, as the...

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist." Stephen Hawking That's perfectly clear. Looks like it's you who's actually...

There is no science to support any so called fine tuning or any appearances of it. There is only an appearance of tuning. Both are true statements. What can't you understand? Perhaps it is English comprehension itself you're struggling with.

Side stepping into a different issue is no answer. That's the thing. You have no answer. So you troll up something you can extrapolate twisted and confused conclusions from to show yet again how you really don't understand what the hell you're talking about. All goes to exhibit how...

Here's a proper one for you then... "Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist."

The fatuous non-argument you constantly repeat was "finely" understood ages ago before you trolled it out a thousand times. There are no "incredible fine tunings". Making that false assumption from non existent and incomplete evidence doesn't make anything fine tuned or incredible except...

Jem -- you produce more than enough bullshit to debunk as it is. ... the "something important" missing is... more science... as the article goes on to say. You're just trying to hide the god word behind "something important is missing". It's more bullshit.

You're being moronic. All that nonsense has already been knocked down. Your shit has been debunked. Regurgitating the same crap they way you do like a broken record is not a rebuttal. It's easy. Deal with the evidence that exposed your bs or you could just stfu.

Relentlessly repeating pretentious false claims ideas and conclusions by distorting and misrepresenting stuff in science and the things scientists say just to try and prop up irrational personal religious belief, makes him pretty good at being what fc?? A total idiotard maybe.

Trolling again the same debunked arguments the way you do is about as far away from truthful explanation as anyone can get. Present current science? Lol. Don't make me laugh. You couldn't present your own ass in a present your own ass contest.

You wish. Substantive explanations have been given to you by myself and others in dozens of threads. Because you can't deal with them, you mis-state misrepresent ignore deny and even alter them to curve fit the ridiculous personal pre- conclusions you prefer. Just like you're doing in...

One reason why your ignorance comes as no surprise 1. Why should I explain your false assumptions about things I have not said. 2. Not my science. It's science, there's plenty of it , that shows how life can come from non life. What the hell you don't get will be down to the closed...

...Or do you like to just believe the reality of natural processes compatible with the laws of physics can't create the universe, whilst an imaginary make-believe angry old giant sky pixie can.

Just a doubt, or a gross underestimation in the capability of chemical reaction combined with evolution. I'm sure atheists marvel at the wonder of those without adding in unnecessary help from an imaginary sky Pixie.