Search results

it's said that abstinence makes the Church grow fondlers

Which suggests at least the faithless being more inquiring, are perhaps likely to be more open minded and therefore generally a little more realistic. Doesn't question curiosity & research = information? Nope. A belief in hope is a belief in hope. God is a different word altogether and...

So what's your beef. I'm simply stating that what you are simply stating is obviously bullshit.

The opposite of a physical world is not a spiritual (metaphysical?) world. The opposite of a world is not another world of any sort. Using that commonsensical thinking, how come the opposite of a physical world is not a non physical non existence? How come you have the opposite of life...

Still going round and round in circles I see. .....but puleeze, don't make me laugh. Quoting scientists out of context in all that misrepresentation and deceit of yours. Delusional ramblings as a religious nutter, which has IS NOT meaning -IS-, and you're "standing for science”. WTF...

What do we have we have observational evidence of fine tunings and three possible explanations No "we" don't. There is only an idea, a speculation that the universe is fine tuned. It is not one of those rigorous scientific facts. 1. we have non rigorous speculation about infinite...

...and from the same article which you selectively chose non scientific remarks made directly toward Susskind's own book promotion, you conveniently didn't mention this, from the same "top scientists" in the same article you are desparately trying to misunderstand..... David Gross of UC...

Well there you are jem. You put your foot in your mouth again just like you did with the Susskind video. That's the point you might notice, if you weren't so blinded by religion. There is no "overwhelming evidence" for the type of purpose and design Cardinals and other ID'ers intend...

Who mentioned creation you stupid moron. ..." randomness, statistics and the laws of physics that led to our own design. " For fuks sakes braniac start to get a clue.

a) is not my belief you lunatic. When science tests the universe its findings are those that Susskind expounds. You fukin tool. b) those aren't just Susskind's findings,.... thickhead. Someone needs to try and correct you. You can't even talk sense....' "appears" designed vs designed. '...

Even with no evidence of any other universe Susskind says... " I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence." His ideas are scientifically based but not scientifically proven therefore not faith based. Science does not use faith based concepts as evidence. Religion...

stu - I am starting to believe your are sincere in you lack of comprehesion... jem – I already realize you are sincere in your total lack of honesty and integrity whatever Susskind may or may not have said about any cosmological constant, he has stated the universe came about by...

So what the hell is this then? Here's your own leading scientist saying it was 'chance'. "...it was basically randomness, statistics and the laws of physics that led to our own design. "---Leonard Susskind

Whatever questions are asked of Susskind , and whatever his answers , the point is , you dimmuck, how can YOU reconcile any response he gives after the statements he made in that video you supplied...? " I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence. "---Leonard...

It's just as appropriate then to say there are an infinite amount of events in this universe. More than there are in a "trillions and trillions" other universe event. It is just as reasonable then to expect there are countless other outcomes in this universe which could occur but did not...

A sidetrack. Nothing to do with what you quoted Leonard Susskind saying. Susskind has already stated in the quotes you supplied.. "....the world looks spectacularly designed" .......but isn't. ".....it was basically randomness, statistics and the laws of physics that led to our...

jem, try to do this..... "....so it was basically randomness, statistics and the laws of physics that led to our own design. "---Leonard Susskind " I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence. "---Leonard Susskind Try reconciling those two Susskind comments...

You might deal with the fact you made fraudulent distortions about what Leonard Susskind said to try and support your "Creator" idea. I suggest you do that before starting to tell me how the universe works through your "searches on the internet" via christian apologist sites.

You've made an appeal for the the actual.... followed by an inference to abandon the actual Brilliant.

Well obviously, it comes from the same or a +1 more logical or +1 more illogical place than wherever God came from LOL!! Then God is false too. If +1 cannot exist outside of totality then totality does not include all things. Therefore totality is not as you define it. In your confused...