Search results

FYI... a STATE law regulating abortion can still be challenged in the SC under the standards set for all other health and welfare laws A law regulating abortion, like other health and welfare laws, is entitled to a “strong presumption ofvalidity.” Hel- ler, 509 U.S, at 319. It must be...

many americans claim it is murder solely on religious reasons so it does have something to do with religion when politicians base their decision on their religion... at some point it turns from a medical procedure to a viable fetus and that line has shifted in history for medical reasons. That...

in this country it has become a heavily religious issue unfortunately.... the constitutional issue is about the perons' right to decide for themselves to get an abortion and when do the State's rights override the mother's to be able to regulate it. This is a very legal issue but the defining...

the only stupidity is talking about men getting pregnant... there is no transgender issues here so stop forcing them in because you ran out of intelligent things to say on the abortion issue. There is no gender confusion with respect to pregnancy and no one in the Court, Congress or in the...

Here is an interesting part of the Dobbs draft that is well written. Sorry for poor text but copying and pasting is hard from this text. Without any grounding in the constitutional text, history, or precedent, it imposed on the entire country a detailedset ofrules much like those thatone...

lets see if they give this attacker the Will Smith treatment haha... standing ovation and professional recognition. Then again this guy had weapons on him so way worse.

there are no longer the great legal scholars we had on both conservative and liberal sides. We have glorified law clerks with ivy league degrees who want a political career versus a judicial one. You can disagree with a well written decision but respect the legal reasoning. Dobbs case case...

Vax mandates have existed for many decades so not sure why you are still blabbering about vaccine mandates unless you never sent a child to school or served in the military. A woman's choice over her body was already supported by the Constitution but the moral and religious aspects of abortion...

there are no doubts or issues over the definition of a woman with respect to.abortion. you are just reaching because abortion involves a pregnancy...nothing to do with definitions of a woman. GOP is fine forcing raped or abused women to keep the baby....has nothing to do with State rights.

Most people's abortion views are not based on the Constitution but on their own religious beliefs for the most part. The desire to overturn Roe was mainly from fundamentalists or supposed Christians. Roe didnt even mandate wide open abortions, it set a framework for when laws would be...

Gonna get very bumpy.. trying to rotate out of most oil and into some real estate and dividend stocks and ride this out :).

If they won the election in 2016 then they could have nominated 2 justices to shape the court. Dems just thought it was the "horror" or trump but it was GOP control for SC appointments. Mitch did what I would have expected Chuck to do in similar situation...

Do you think I want government that gets upset over a case and decides to destroy the SC and our government over it by packing the court with flaming libs simply because the dems lost to trump in 2016 and are bitter? remember the Miss law did not ban abortions, only after 15 weeks.

Not sure what a white house can do about this SC decision if it comes out as in the draft....stomp the podium and mumble shit maybe

the supreme court did not ban abortions, they just said states can decide as elected representatives of their citizens what their legal requirements on abortion will be. There is no such thing as a nationwide ban on abortion.

Here is the clause in question I was referring to: None ofthe other decisions cited by Roe and Casey involved the critical moral question posed by abortion. They are therefore inapposite. They do not sup- port the right toobtain anabortion, and by the same token, our conclusion that the...

To be fair as I am digging into the decision this Court specifically separates marriage, schools and similar rights as foundational in the constitution and made a distinction about those rights being untouchable versus how abortion was established in R v. W. I think it would be hyperbole for...

good point but it is 98 pages so I have to pace myself to read it haha... give me a few days :).

Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia made her most outlandish claim yet, this time suggesting that women choose to get abortions because Satan himself "whispers" that men will marry them if they do.

My point is the decision has a detailed carve out as to why abortion and the associated right to privacy is not part of the Constitution and therefore being bumped back to the States. If they are not careful they set a bad precedent where many other rights can be bounced out of the constitution...