Search results

Like a broken record. Except you don't know it's both broken, and irrelevant. You are making yourself look even more like a clueless idiot.

Only a moron assumes that potency is related to concentration. So of course you do. "From the foregoing, it is clear that CO2 is the key atmospheric gas that exerts principal control (80% of the non-condensing GHG forcing) over the strength of the terrestrial greenhouse effect. Water vapor and...

I'm sorry but his obvious attempts to sound impressive coupled with his ridiculous illogical conclusions I find even more irritating than jem's BS. But I guess I have his politics wrong.

Do you even know how stupid you sound ? Go back to your cartoons and leave this for the adults, child.

Oh, so as I suspected, he is another jem? I really don't get piezoe. In some respects he is reasonable and intelligent but with this he is off the wall. Maybe he is trying too hard to appear even-handed? Maybe it's just a side-effect of being a Libtardarian.

Really? Let me get this clear. You are not sure if the recent rise in CO2 is from man but might be from some unexplained rise in temps that has then released CO2? That might be possible if were not for the fact that, among other things, the oceans are ABSORBING CO2 NOT EMITTING it. This...

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these...

Murry's two biggest "wrongs" out of many If I had to pick one giant flaw in Murry's nonsense I'd find it hard to choose between the following two: Denying the science of the greenhouse effect: His topsy turvy "temperature-induced" claim - he doesn't attempt to explain what has caused earth...

A certain Professor Murry Salby has become the toast of the denialosphere after a talk in which he gives academic CPR to the long-flatlined myth that natural sources account for the recent rise in CO2 concentrations. Along the way he revisits other "skeptical" golden oldies, arguing that CO2...

Who cares what this idiot says? Oh that's right, moron deniers, that need to find someone, anyone who will keeps their delusion alive in the face of overwhelming evidence showing that man is causing the earth to warm. This idiot seems to think there is still some debate about it. There is...

Try Googling it luc.

I could explain to you again, but you wouldn't understand it lucrum, again

Yes it's complicated. If one wants yearly resolution to climate prediction. But the relationship between atmospheric levels of CO is a simple and direct one. CO2 levels act like the setpoint of the earth's thermostat. The following relationship is pretty direct. The relationship between the...

Man used to release 9 billion tons of CO2 per year into the atmosphere at the close of ice ages. Not a fact. Fact: the debate about man made global warming is over among those who are the experts. As opposed to what you are.

No, it's very simple lucrum. Even you might understand some day. Fact: CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Fact: We have raised it's levels by 40%. Fact: The earth is warming and there is no other cause for it. Simple. That's why the scientific debate about this basic truth is over.

You are truly insane aren't you?

You have no science showing evolution is true. If you do, you also have it for man made global warming. Same thing. Science. But you seem to have some strange definition of it that the world of science does not.

Yes, Lucrum = 666 = moron.

Yes, it is within the models predictions. Even without the probability bands. Try again lucrum.

Yeah ok lucrum, whatever you say. Are you too embarrassed by your former moronic persona?