Search results

But there has become too much wealth inequity. Why can't righties understand this?

Willie Wei-Hock Soon is an aerospace engineer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Since 1992, Dr. Soon has been an astronomer at the Mount Wilson Observatory. Soon is also a receiving editor with the journal New Astronomy.[2] Soon is a prominent climate change skeptic who has...

LOL Willie Soon Like I said, not a single respected publishing climate expert.

Yes, and Canada is instituting a tax on carbon emissions. The Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, said on Monday that Canada will impose a tax on carbon emissions starting in 2018 as part of its efforts to meet targets set by the Paris climate change accord. Trudeau made the announcement...

For a good laugh.

Todd the troll.

That list has been debunked many many times. populartechnology.net? bwahahahahah! And yet you STILL cannot find ONE respected publishing climate scientist that denies global warming. There are THOUSANDS of them in the world and you cannot find ONE.

He is a nobody. Not a climate scientist and he's a flake. Like I said, irrelevant. Like everything else about climate change that you post. You keep avoiding the question. WHat about what every climate expert and science org on earth says? Do you think that ALL the experts should be given...

Yes, and nothing in that chart conflicts with the author's opinion that man made global warming is a big problem. Good point. Well done.

Who? What about what every climate expert and science org on earth says? Where do you get this irrelevant stuff? Your asshole? You really should stuff it back in.

One person said it MAY, and it's going to happen pretty soon. The prediction is not far off. Within ten years. And so what? Has CO2 ceased being a greenhouse gas? Because we have raised it by 40%.

So Trump wants to tax the wealthy more and Hillary wants to give to people like Trump more breaks? Is that what you Trumpers "think". Just where, if anywhere, do you get your information? Breitbarf? The comics?

One was an interesting story, one was not. Try again. I will certainly admit that the media goes for what's popular. That's why they avoid talking about global warming. They would lose too many viewers if they brought it up.

Yes, the top 1% and especially the top 0.1 % needs to be taxed more. They could pay for free public college for all for instance with a small increase in their taxes. The system has been in their favor for too long. Just look at Trump. No income taxes? Really? But the Trumpers think...

Yes, facts have a liberal bias. The media in general is NOT liberally biased. You are listening to turd Trump and right wing propaganda too much. For instance, the dumb right considers the reporting on the science of global warming "liberal bias" . Horseshit. It's a fact.

So what evidence do you have of this so-called "media bias". Your feels? That you have told that by Trump? The media bias shit is mostly nonsense. Yes Faux News has bias. Yes MSNBC has some bias. But on average there is no media bias. The media is mostly composed of intelligent people...

Jem, take your meds. Please.

The people in the media are smart and know what's going on. So it just seems like a liberal bias but in fact is just facts. The GOP establishment are the smart ones. That's how they got there. They are smart, so of course they know that Trump is a yuge joke and an ignorant classless...

Dumb racist Trumper exhibit one^.

Hillary wants to fix it. Trump wants more of the same. Are you even paying attention?