Search results

The scientific authors of the papers were also contacted and asked to rate their own papers, and again over 97% whose papers took a position on the cause said humans are causing global warming.

We went through this already jerm, only 0.3 % expressly said that man has caused most of the warming over the last fifty years. Just like a similar percentage of biology papers expressly say that evolution is responsible for the current state of living organisms. A basic scientific fact is...

The Weather Channel Position Statement on Global Warming November 2007 Introduction The scientific issue of global warming can be broken down into three main questions: Is global warming a reality? Are human activities causing it? What are the prospects for the future? Warming: Fact or...

Simply put, man made global warming deniers are idiots.

A question that frequently arises in popular discussion of climate change is whether there is a scientific consensus on climate change.[123] Several scientific organizations have explicitly used the term "consensus" in their statements: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2006...

Various surveys have been conducted to evaluate scientific opinion on global warming. They have concluded that the majority of scientists support the idea of anthropogenic climate change. In 2004, the geologist and historian of science Naomi Oreskes summarized a study of the scientific...

This is a list of scientific bodies of national or international standing, that have issued formal statements of opinion, classifies those organizations according to whether they concur with the IPCC view, are non-committal, or dissent from it. Concurring[edit] Academies of science (general...

you're an idiot Every science organization in the world. 97% of the climatologists..

Essentially.....moron. I guess you did not read the links and prefer to stay ignorant.

Read moron. Do you know how to read? http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

Yes, only the entire world's science community believes it. I'll go with them. Not you. Moron.

Science achieves a consensus when scientists stop arguing. When a question is first asked – like ‘what would happen if we put a load more CO2 in the atmosphere?’ – there may be many hypotheses about cause and effect. Over a period of time, each idea is tested and retested – the...

So it's your contention that virtually the entire world's science community is in on some kind of hoax? Really? Because make no mistake, it IS virtually the entire science community. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

It's pretty funny how get up all this fake outrage as if that will make your bullshit any more authoritative. Very amusing. Especially since you KNOW it's bullshit. Jerm, it's not the sun. The climatologists know this. That's why over 97% say that man is responsible along with all the...

Read and learn douchebag. Just maybe you won't embarrass yourself and the rest of the denialist nutters so much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

Solar output is going down over the last 40 years even as the earth continues to heat. It's not the sun.

Dissenting See also: List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming As of 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[11] no scientific body of national or international standing rejected the findings of...