Search results

Hey piehole! Think the rise in CO2 is just due to natural CO2 cycles? Maybe the isotope measuring isn't accurate. Perhaps the earth just decided to burp huge amounts of CO2 exactly when man started burning fossil fuels. Yeah, that's it. Can't be sure if man did it. After all there is the...

Hey piehole, you blustering bag of bullshit. What do you think the chances are that the increase in CO2 is due to man? Just a coincidence? Yeah, just a coincidence.

The Geological Society of America "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human...

American Physical Society "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of...

American Meteorological Society "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons...

American Geophysical Union "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007...

Oh wow Lucrum, one year? Maybe with twenty more like that it will be back to normal!

FHL, we know you are an idiot. You don't have to keep reminding us.

Hey, idiot. http://youtu.be/pPRd5GT0v0I Mythbusters confirm the greenhouse effect of CO2.

Do the dumb righties give up? Answer: CO2 is a greenhouse gas. LOL You right wing idiots have to be pulling my leg. You can't really be this stupid.

Guess why CO2 increase can lead temperatures higher?

CO2 didn't initiate warming from past ice ages but it did amplify the warming. In fact, about 90% of the global warming followed the CO2 increase. During this period, CO2 and temperatures are closely correlated, which means they rise and fall together. However, based on Antarctic ice core...

Your brain is uncoupled from anything remotely resembling intelligence. And, once again, you seem to think the scientists are as stupid as you are. 1/25000th is irrelevant dipstick. CO2 largely controls the temperature of the earth with that concentration. Wow you are dumb. Only a righty...

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Murry-Salby-Confused-About-The-Carbon-Cycle.html Without viewing Salby's calculations on the temperature/net global CO2 relationship, it's not possible to provide the 'killer blow' to his assertions; however, I don't believe that's necessary, considering the...

Murry Salby: Galileo? Bozo? Or P.T.Barnum? http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/07/12/murry-salby-galileo-bozo-or-p-t-barnum “They laughed at Galileo … but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown” might be appled to Murry Salby, who until May was a Professor of Environmental Science at...

Yes, and the laws of physics are not true. Your stupidity knows no bounds. I found something that may help you understand. Something on your level. http://climatekids.nasa.gov/greenhouse-effect/

I'm not going to even bother with the rest of the unbelievably stupid bullshit you wrote. The first statement in bold is just plain fucking wrong. CO2 has gone up 40% due to man's emissions. We know how much we have put in the air because we know how much fuel we have burned. It started...

Just amazing..you keep forgetting that CO2 can lead or lag, why do you keep forgetting that CO2 is a greenhouse gas? ..and again with this Salby crap study that is not relevant. Unbelievable. Maybe you did not read this the first ten times I posted it..... "From the foregoing, it is...

No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent...

Scientific organizations endorsing the consensus The following scientific organizations endorse the consensus position that "most of the global warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities": American Association for the Advancement of Science American Astronomical Society...