Search results

Do you think that it is extremely logical to conclude that this recent spike in CO2 levels is due to man? If you want my personal opinion, I think it is premature to draw that specific conclusion. [ICO2 spike is right on schedule and likely is a natural occurrence ][/I] Thank you for...

What a surprise. You can't answer a simple very relevant question. Is this spike in CO2 from man or not?

So you actually think this recent CO2 spike might not be due to man's emissions? That's some funny stuff right there.

So then Salby goes to work for a college, who fires him for not working and stealing. Salby's employment at Macquarie was terminated in 2013. Macquarie University stated that he was dismissed for refusing to fulfill his teaching responsibilities and for inappropriate use of university...

Yeah Salby is going to a prize alright. LOL The National Science Foundation investigation report issued on 20 February 2009 found that Salby had overcharged his grants and violated financial conflict of interest policies, displaying "a pattern of deception, a lack of integrity, and a...

That means the decisions we’re making today — to continue along a path that’s almost entirely carbon-dependent — are locking us in for long-term consequences that we will not be able change but only adapt to, at enormous cost. To protect New York City from rising seas and storm surges is...

THERE is a time for weighing evidence and a time for acting. And if there’s one thing I’ve learned throughout my work in finance, government and conservation, it is to act before problems become too big to manage. For too many years, we failed to rein in the excesses building up in the...

Interesting. The level of denial is amazing. That you would think that this spike could be ANYTHING other than man's emissions is the best proof to date of what an intellectually dishonest, illogical, ideologically crazed whack job you are. Not that it matters what YOU think...

Oh, and 666/lucrum? You are now on ignore.

So Lucrum. Why are you now going by 666? So you don't appear as obsessive as you actually are?

He said no such thing moron and the data was not "fudged". It was adjusted to compensate for the urban heat island effect. But by all means continue to keep deluding yourself with lies. You apparently can't handle the truth. Too stupid.

Wow. Just wow. I'm dumbfounded. Simple question. Do you think that it is extremely logical to conclude that this recent spike in CO2 levels is due to man? Or not.

Doesn't matter what this handful of low level non-scientist right wing nut jobs think. Why would you think it does? The debate is over.

OK asshole. Show me the quote, in context, where Hansen says he is a skeptic. Can you do that one thing instead of this huge dump of total bullshit denialist nutter propaganda. Why can't you ever use authoritative sources like NOAA NASA The Met Service etc? Why do you always quote know...

Ha ha, Hansen a skeptic. Good one moron. Wrong. And he certainly was muzzled by the Bushies. Adjusting for the urban heat island is the correct thing to do and does not change anything with regard to world temps. Fool. World temps have not paused. Since 1997 they have gone up over...

we are interested in GLOBAL temps, not the US. Idiot.

Data was adjusted to consider the urban heat island effect to make it more accurate and it's only the US which is not the issue. Even with the old less accurate data, the world is rapidly warming. But of course to ignorant deluded righties this proper science method is all part of the grand...

It doesn't matter to you that this is bullshit does it? Besides, we are interested in GLOBAL temps, not the US. Idiot.