Search results

Of course they track man's release of CO2 you lying sack of bullshit.

Well he used the term proxy because that's what Salby erroneously does also. I think it's pathetic that both jerm and piehole are both attacking the factual data. As if hundreds of actual experts (as opposed to what they are) have not checked all this stuff out. Of course CO2 levels have...

That's how clueless jerm is. He thinks the ice record is a proxy for CO2 levels.

Singed Toe. Congratulations, you too are also now on ignore. There is nothing from you that will be missed. Go fuck yourself, asshole.

The ice record is not a proxy for CO2 levels. There is nothing wrong with the ice record for CO2 levels. It is certainly accurate enough to determine levels have gone up 40% at the start of the Ind. Rev.. There is zero question about it. You are a fucking liar.

Piehole. Salby is a fraud and a fool. Do a search on him. He has zero respect among true scientists. His diffusion theory is total bullshit. He is not an ice expert. He is a joke. What is wrong with reliable sources like the hundreds of ice scientists who have studied this issue up...

You strain credulity. Are you for real?

"..............The former Treasury secretaries — including Henry M. Paulson Jr., a Republican who served under President George W. Bush, and Robert E. Rubin, a Democrat in the Clinton administration — promised to help sound the alarm. All endorse putting a price on greenhouse gases, most...

So you don't think the spike is due to man. Alrighty then.

So which one of you denier/liars will the first to admit that the recent spike in CO2 by 40% is due to man? Anyone of you have an ounce of intellectual integrity?

No you said that the recent spike - and there is NO doubt that there is a historic spike - is likely natural. Don't try to walk it back when faced with obvious absurdity of the statement. Salby is a fool and and a liar and more importantly just plain wrong. Why you continue to refer to...

So jem, you weasely sack of lying shit, is the recent 40% spike in CO2 from man or not?

Note how all the data sets coincide with each other. Of course CO2 is spiking 40% due to man. Only a right wing buffoon would think otherwise.

The ice records (multiple) mesh with atmospheric perfectly. The ice record is reliable. The recent spike of CO2 is of course from man. One would have to be total idiot not to think so.

Jerm you weasely sack of lying shit, the chart is accurate. Is it due to man or not? piehole at least had the complete audacity to say it is likely natural. What say you?

Hey jem, you lying sack of shit, this is all one data set. Is the spike due to man?

So what if they are not the same data sets? The resulting chart is accurate enough to see that there has been a huge spike. Is it from man or not? Stop avoiding the essential point and putting up smoke screens you lying POS.

What do you "think" jem. Using the term think very loosely. As a lying sack of shit what do you think? Manmade CO2 increase or not?

So jem. Is this recent spike in CO2 due to man's burning of huge amounts of fossil fuels....or not.

We don't listen to right wing denialist fraudulent propaganda sources. Try NOAA. Why oh why can't you ever use reliable sources? You are a joke.