Search results

Which is same as moving average.

over 3.25 (plus commish) to make money

The technical analysis back testing can be done using one normalized (analytical) example --- this is similar to "one does not need a table for each normal distribution. If you knows the results for N(0,1), one can know the results for other normal distributions."

LOL!

If you have enough money, why you do not start an entity and PM me an offer to trade what you saw?

LOL! Is he showing the size/shape of carla's lower lips to potential future liquidy providers?:D

I read a number of posts of Iceman recently, and I believe he is really good.

You see, smart money has again kicked dumb money at the area of the bottom. Stick it to them at the top, and kicking their azzes at the bottom.:)

Could you please provide the whole list and/or the list of numbers to make the calculations?

bump

2:40PM: e/u at 1.3920 area. Is lunch time over?

Does anyone know when the euro gals/gents in the company of the shortest president will finish their work? I do not read the news, so if someone can share his knowledge it would be useful. I also like to hear the gossip, if there is any.

I just heard that they are not offering a free meal for the remainder of today, but somehow people in the markets appear to be walking with cutting knives in their hands looking for a free steak.

You are confused, because you trade trends in hindsight. The market is teaching you, and you are paying the tuition without failing/arguing/etc.

qqq at 57.25. The lunchon time. Are they flipping burgers, one at time stacked in pyramids?

qqq at 56.29. $2.33 for the sharks. I would bet that the troll in chief and the drama queens have now noticed the down trend in hindsight. Is it a good place for the sharks to take some profits? :cool: This thing is moving faster than me typing. What is wrong bulls? Now 56.22... where is the...

She reads the results of the polls in your threads.:)

Because it shows that traders may be selling something for nothing. Are they aware of it?

For the analytical minds, let me try to explain things differently. The gain to make up for a loss, is a convex increasing function of the loss. In language of options' "gamma", a trader in the above sense, is always short gamma, but unlike in options, a trader does not get a premium for...

I get a fail in spelling, and you get a fail in thinking/answering the question. A fair trade? PS: You should have checked the spelling of the numbers instead!