Search results

  1. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    For the umpteenth time, Hawking's top down does not invoke a multiverse. You don't understand top-down, Hawking, or what it is you are agreeing with.
  2. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    LOL :D You scored 2 from 2. It can't be healthy reacting that way, just because your God got poked a bit with a stick. cheer up.
  3. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    You are a liar because of lies like the one you make right there. Get it ? Bottom-up or top-down, you don't know what the hell it is you're agreeing with. You clearly don't realize what Hawking is agreeing with. The calculation which gives a value, which you've said is 'incredibly...
  4. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    Well you've certainly shown often enough on this board how you can lose your head and still not understand much at all. No matter how much "witnessing" you do lol, fact is, gravity not god, fuck face.
  5. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    You keep making the same mistakes and telling the same lies over and over. I have never denied anything Susskind has said. What he has said is not an issue. It's what you and other religious eccentrics say he says which is what's completely wrong and frankly dishonest. You keep trying to...
  6. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    So now you disagree with Susskind ruling out luck/chance as an explanation. sheesh. You should just stick to the childish name calling. It's really all you got. Anyway, tell Jem one of Susskind's explanations is no explanation. He'll now be a moron troll with shit for brains as you say. Not...
  7. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    No they actually discuss and explain one explanation. It's not 'God', it's not 'chance', it's not 'don't know'. It's no good accusing me of breaking with reality when you already have. I have quoted Susskind. That's when you usually ignore or start with your lying or name calling or go...
  8. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    Three explanations, God-chance-don't know, are equally explanied. That is..not at all. There is only one explanation that is given any explanation at all and it's science based. Megaverse. You have a very difficult time being rational. With your head so far up jem's ass now it's just...
  9. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    The longer you try to argue Susskind is saying something in a video that he isn't saying in a video, the longer you'll remain a liar and an idiot. It's that simple really.
  10. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    I think jem's battle is more with himself really. Being truthful is something he obviously struggles a great deal with.
  11. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    yeah yeah, whatever. You really should take your own advice. There are 4 things not 2 - that are called explanations. 3 of them, chance, don't know, and God are given no explanation at all. God, grouped with chance and don't know. Appropriate. Megaverse is given explanation...
  12. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    So anyone saying or trying to give an impression the fine structure constant IS incredibly fine tuned , is talking bullshit. The value of the cosmological constant has not been confirmed. So saying it IS incredibly fine tuned , which you tried to do, is talking bullshit. To sum up, you've...
  13. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    I was wondering how long before complete fantasy took you over. I said, I don't refute the video. The video doesn't say God exists. What is it with you religious eccentrics that you think it so ok to be utterly dishonest when chasing up your own a$$'s for your silly beliefs.
  14. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    As angry and agressive in denial as ever. Well, it's only what one might expect a "man of God" to act like. But whatever. You are a liar. Some information for you. When a scientist says in a video you keep posting, there is an appearance of fine tuning, and then you state he is saying...
  15. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    You are wrong. I do not refute the video. I refute the ridiculous conclusions Jem jumps to after misquoting and misrepresenting that "very interesting video" he's posted like an idiot a million times. Oh I was being polite alright. But what BS? What flawed logic? What divisive manner...
  16. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    It's already been established. The only way you can counter what I say, is to lie about what I say. Are you now trying to break your own record of repeat posting videos with repeat posting outright lies. The thing is you don't think. That's your problem, as well as of course as not wanting...
  17. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    No indeed. The fool that started this nonsense was Jem. I was being polite. What you pointed out is foolish... something a fool would point out. And you have presented what exactly apart from a lesson in projecting your own obvious shortcomings and brown nosing your Godbuddy. I've provided...
  18. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    You have been beating back science to make irrational conclusions just so you can remain in denial for years. Your knowledge is growing Lol..don't make me laugh. Your knowledge in pseudoscience might be growing with all the religiously motivated horseshit you swallow. Because you choose...
  19. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    Religious websites are not science. They aim to confuse so that gullible goofs like you will fall for a godunnit horseshit explanation which is in fact, no explanation at all. It is not known what the so called fine tuning number is , because there is not yet enough information to fix it...
  20. S

    Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

    You show all the signs of being immensely dense. That's why you apparently see what you see and why I rather appropriately repeated your own words back at you. What's the difference. You might as well argue with yourself. You have nothing to offer but retarded insult and they suit you...
Back
Top