Search results

You not understanding the subject or being purposely ignorant about it, or both, is not me lying. Lol. Look, I already suggested you go and educate yourself first, to stop making such a fool of yourself.

I said how the cosmological constant could be zero. Wake up. Susskind explains the cosmological constant at a value allowing for an expanding universe. Dark energy could do away with the cosmological constant and its so called 'fine-tuning' all together. It's obvious you don't understand...

Present science!?...to you!?? don't make me laugh. What, so you can misread, misinterpret, misrepresent and misquote it like you always do. The cosmological constant (vacuum energy), is a mathematical function, not a known or fixed value of the universe. When Einstein included the term in...

What you present is untrue and distorted claims and comments you can't reason. Hawking does not mention the word multiverse in the paper you've referred to let alone base his science on it . Susskind does not say there IS any fine tuning in the video no matter how many times you keep...

"you are mixing and matching models and theories like you just read some website but you have no idea what is real or what is theory...." There you go, projecting your own tactics again. "but you either accept the models scientists are currently using...." ....you are accepting...

There is no science that states the cosmological constant cannot change by "a millionth or a billionth or a trillionth". It may come as a surprise to you but making shit up like that is not science. It shows again how little you understand. Physics also has "your something that is tuned to...

The Standard Model requires mathematical calculations to be introduced so that predictions can be made from it. Were the Standard Model complete, values of those parameters would be determined by the model itself. The Cosmological Constant is one such mathematical calculation. Saying...

1. unsolicited? Yes. You've started with the ad homs, contrary to your claims. 2. The multiverse is conjecture... So 'fine tuning' is conjecture too. duh.

See? Another unsolicited ad hom. You can't help yourself. They used no such thing as 20 constants fine tuned to 30 decimal places to find Higgs. The Standard Model gives values to constants which your own references such as Stephen Weinberg account for in any case. You haven't a clue...

You're right in as much as "we" don't need to consider your knowledge considering how apparent you've made it how little you have . What takes faith is saying as you do, "the fine tuning" , when no scientist including Susskind says the universe IS fine tuned. Susskind and the rest you...

So ...all you are confirming, apart from how little you understand about the term landscape and the subject in general, is how Susskind explains why your 'Tuner Creator Designer God' is not required. How many times is that now you've shot yourself in the foot? I lost count.

Posting Susskind is not what can be called an intelligent response to what you said was Hawking mentioning or involving the Multiverse, which of course Hawking specifically does not. But no issue with Susskind anyway now as you admit. He explained why your 'Tuner Creator Designer God' is...

Nowhere in the paper does it mention the word multiverse. That's because it actually doesn't call for the multiverse. As per usual you go out of your way to try to make people say, in this case Stephen Hawking, something they don't say or even suggest. Mainly because you don't know what...

Dude you get so frustrated annoyed and angry trying to lever a God into everything where it doesn't belong. sheesh..... All you are doing is demonstrating how much you don't understand. Alternative...one of a number of things from which only one can be chosen. Hawking would have used...

Because you don't understand science and prefer only to read your own crap into it ,.... that is not me denying science. It was not essential to know precise mathematical theoretical values for physical constants to propose Higgs as yet another of your ridiculous comments claims. The...

What a load of utter horseshit. Where do you get that crap? Hawking specifically does not include -the multiverse- or versions of -the multiverse- in top down. In top down, Hawking proposes an initial condition for the universe as a quantum superimposition of all possible conditions...

Well, so? You keep posting the same fucking thing as if you had a point. You don't. Pretty much each time I told you why you don't, then you post the fucking thing again. "you are such a troll" yourself. Hawking describes wave function, by which he proposes all possible outcomes are...

WTF !!?. They use math! No kidding!! They had to know math to look down the pointy end then. What is your problem.

Before criticizing others you need to go heal yourself first with the tone you present. It doesn't surprise me you've made yourself your imaginary friend's bitch, but don't include me in your perversion. Not everyone folds like you have under a cheap threat. Get back to me when you...

What are you talking about - "How did science predict where they would find the Higgs?" Higgs was predicted by theorizing that tiny fractions of a second after big bang, some of the radiation energy would form the Higgs field. In the Standard Model all particles then get all their mass from...