Search results

It's a very funny kind of erosion of opinion that has worldwide national science academies overwhelmingly agreeing AGW is real with no scientific body dissenting. Nevertheless, the figures I responded to are piezoe's, not the ones you quote. They represent a consensus however much you...

No it isn't.

That is still the point. A conscenus exists among climate experts and it isn't that global warming is not man made.

What would be most likely is, you have no-life. Spending your time making angry post after angry post , starting thread after thread, day after day. And you think I'm a troll. Lol Yeah sure. You have a grounding all right , in bullshit. As I said. Your suspicions are as defective as your...

Truth will out eh. You recognize greenhouse gas aerosols cause an anthropic change in temperature outside natural variation. But conveniently, the release of billions of tons of greenhouse gas CO2 into the atmosphere, decade after decade after decade, won't. You'd do what exactly? What...

Yeah yeah whatever. The usual bullshit. Your 'science' is the kind that can prove the Earth is flat. Heard it all before. A thread title to misconstrue what NASA does say about stuff which is already known. Done to deny widely recognized scientific sources which conclusively say X, so you...

That's right conspiracy guy. You like the science until you don't like what the science says. Unless it does say what you want to hear then it suddenly becomes -real science- with everyone and everything else a great big international UN conspiracy. You?..... looking for the truth?.... my ass.

As a full time troll with an obsessive posting disorder on anything and everything, your suspicions are badly flawed much like your reasoning. Of course you would expect everyone to be constantly loitering around the place to make immediate responses just because you are. Real science Lol...

The funny thing is, you really mustn't have any understanding how much in utter denial the stuff you post shows you to be. The only sock puppet around here was proven to be yourself. You were caught red handed. You didn't let people know....you were outed. You admitted to it and are still...

Very true. But then Jem is prone to be sucked in by that sort of purposeful confusion designed to appeal to let's say, the less scrupulous with certain political persuasions and weird beliefs, like Jem and pspr.

Well that clinches it. You're crap is formally confirmed as totally fucked. murry t turtle likes it.

Nevermind you might...you did. You tend to link to bullshit that way . You're a denier, an eccentric, a winger. What else would you do. I've noticed how there is nothing you like more than starting off posting something that is horseshit wrong.

So? What are you trying to suggest by it? Twisting the facts about solar flares and the reaction of the upper atmosphere doesn't support non-climate change. "both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth’s upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect...

Pay more attention then you might recognize a valid fact when it smacks you in the face. Funny how you don't see the instigation of insults by deniers.

NASA admits no such thing. The climate change denier idiots from Principeea whatever, claimed NASA admits things they quite clearly do not. Solar reflection happens all the time and measurements return various values depending on intensity. NASA was reporting an intense period. Deniers...

You've been shown what NASA states about human CO2 and climate change. You made 'NASA science' the standard with an OP. You're denying NASA science. You're a denier. The science doesn't matter to you. You wish I lost the god debate but that's just one of your very few attributes, wishful...

Let's face it, you see jack shit.

hey jerk... You're the one with an OP claiming to be relying on 'NASA science'. I've posted what 'NASA science' says about CO2. You want me to post it again? "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important...

So? what the fuck point are you trying to make... do you even know? Greenhouse gases in the upper atmosphere shed heat back into space. So add more CO2 !? Is that your conclusion? Mess up the natural balance.It might not matter?! Too much, and it won't any longer be a question of...

"Principia Scientific" linked in the OP are hard core climate deniers who wrote the book "Slaying the Dragon". They have nothing to do with science, except in trying to fuck about with it. Indulging in fact twisting re-interpretations, utterly misrepresenting the NASA report which was to do...