Search results

I asked what difference it made. But you never made any sort of reply, douchey or otherwise. If you want to look it up, just search for "difference". By now, however, I'm really not interested in what you think since you don't much.

And what were the rioters carrying?

You have to highlight the field and right-click "Search Google for . . .". I imagine that will be fixed eventually. But what's with all this space? Double and triple-spacing and yards of white. Better oil the scroll button.

I hesitate to throw a wrench into this, but since jem never answered my question -- repeated several times -- about what difference it makes, I'll ask again, hoping for an intelligent answer. I suspected that all of this would come about back when we punched a hole through the ozone layer, and...

Their job is to do what the law tells them and allows them to do. You have yet to demonstrate any knowledge of what the law is.

No, I'm saying that no one is entitled to equal pay unless he or she has equal experience, equal skill, equal talent, equal whatever else is required for the job. If all of these people are equally qualified AND not receiving equal pay, then you have something to rant about.

Also helps to look at things like experience. As I said, look at the data rather than offer a knee-jerk response.

On the other hand . . . The racial/ethnic diversity of staff on Democratic campaigns appears impressive. African Americans account for 12% of the American workforce (source) but account for more than twice that share of the workforce on Democratic federal-level campaigns. Staffers of Hispanic...

What politicians aren't?

http://honestgil.com/

Yep. Pretty much.

Stop trying to be reasonable! In a couple of years, it'll be Hillary who's to blame for everything. Then there might be a Republican, if there are any Republicans by then, but Hillary will still be to blame.

Speaking of evading questions, you have yet to answer the question about the law. These guys are doing what the law allows them to do. If you don't like it, change the law. But you prefer to rant. Which accomplishes nothing except to make you look like a get-off-my-lawn old geezer. If you'd...

Yeah, right. And you clearly aren't getting any.

You're the one who brought up the "loophole" in "current Federal law". Don't tell me you didn't bother to look it up.

That would be nice. It's like you to blunder through life with blinders on.

And what exactly is the current Federal law? And when was it enacted?

As an observer? Yes.

They're children, idiot, and showing a lot more humanity that you would.

If you believe all this nonsense, then clearly you weren't there.