Search results

They can go to chik-fila

In the 90’s access to derivatives was limited. Also with that much size, any bank would want a vig to offset lay-off costs. Plus tables at Le Cirque weren’t cheap.

MAGA!

Only if you earn their weight in gold a year

So I figure there’s two types of securities: Those that are available to trade publicly and those that aren’t (for example class B or warrants). In any case, I can’t see how the company can prevent a fund from hedging that position by shorting a different class or with derivatives. Companies...

Other way around. China and russia will pay us for it. KAGA 2020!

what do you think elitetrader is?

That’s too nuanced for Laces Out.

So here’s what took 10 seconds to figure out. The underlying value of the options is approx $6. That is you are getting (45 shares * 12 dollars/share xper + 6 dollars cash)/100 = 6 dollars. Your options are still way out of the money.

Again, in 10 seconds this question would be answered if you just gave the ticker.

Yes. That’s what payment for orderflow is. Market maker sees it before it becomes public.

It totally makes sense for him to diversify his income by giving away his trading secrets.

It’s legit if you understand the business rationale for diversifying. Goldman does it because 1. Synergies 2. They hire people to do the work. (They can add time invested to the new business line) In this guys case, the synergy is supposedly negative as he’s giving away his secrets. Unless...

Stop it with your skepticism. Let them dream.

And your return on capital will be terrible.

I noticed that. Those stocks would be up 10percent premarket and then open up 2percent.

The 11k to 40mm was also a fraud. She didn’t earn 40mm, she raised 40mm of assets.

Now he can comment on sell volatility in his own echo chamber.

Why would you advocate that in your hypothetical trade?

Not when you lever 100:1 as is usual in forex. Do the math your net worth ($100) x .36 x Y = 100. Solve for Y This is based on your fictitious trade.