Search results

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and...

The CIA No she's not. No she did not. Wow you are confused and delusional.

So you admit that you have the same savagery as he did. That's the first step.

Yup, mistakes were made....by many people. Clinton has accepted responsibility although blaming her is a stretch. There was no evil intent by anyone and hopefully lessons were learned. This was just another case of the inadequacies of bureaucracy.

That's what jem does....self deceit. Good call. And he has the nerve to call you a liar. Ha!

Stevens twice refused a military defense unit be stationed at the embassy. He did not want to appear to be defensive and untrusting of the local militia who he counted on to defend the embassy. The video severely undercut the locals loyalty to the embassy and Stevens Hillary did nothing...

But Faux News just wants to get to the "truth". It's not about politics for them. They are fair and balanced. LOL Have they given up saying that yet>

She will be a great president. She is smart and motivated by the desire to do good for the US. IOW her heart is the right place and her head is good. She is for the right things. That's what for one I look for in a president. It would be better if she were younger.

Here ya go CKof I Repeat this three times and you will be fine.

"The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters...

Oh, cartoons again. The last resort of the intellectually bankrupt.

666, do you ever get your "science" from anything other than right wing propaganda outlets? If not, I can understand why are you so deluded.

Yes, using barbarism to counter barbarism is barbaric. Sorry if my ethics are higher than yours.

Idso is a lead author of the reports of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC),[8][9] a project sponsored by the Heartland Institute.[10] An unauthorized release of documents indicate Idso received $11,600 per month in 2012 from the Heartland Institute.[11]

Both the IPCC and its parody are ‘synthesis reports’. They purport to summarise the science of climate change. You might expect that both reports would draw on all the recent climate science available to them. This is true of the IPCC, but in the case of the NIPCC, it has been noted that...

the NIPCC was created by the Heartland Institute, a privately run organisation with significant connections to the fossil fuel industry, from whom it receives funding. Heartland was previously associated with campaigns funded by the tobacco industry to discredit science attesting to the damage...

I guess you are not aware that the NIPCC is a construction of the Heartland Institute........a conservative "think" tank. Pure propaganda. The IPCC is the best source of real science. Maybe you go to known propaganda outlets for your science. I do not. Not to mention that the report is full...

The film did play a role. Stevens himself is partly to blame for refusing more guards. Hillary did not lie. Obama did not lie. Lower level State dept officials messed up. It was a local homegrown operation partly spurred by the video. Any other questions?

He is offensively dumb

Washington, April 30 2014 The GOP today told the poor workers of America to go to hell. "If we pay you more money the well-to-do business owners, the corporations and us middle class white people will have less money. Our burgers will cost ten cents more and it will crush the economic...