Search results

So I see we have yet another deluded righty/libertarian in our midst. There is no publication bias except that it be good science. This paper was not. Period.

Back to the OP. The reason the paper was rejected was because it was shit. That's why. Just so we're clear.

Jem..... over nine thousand scientists over the last year agree that our fossil fuel emissions are principally responsible for contemporary climate change, and just one disagrees. What percent is that jem? I think it's your 0.03% LOL

Of course they did. Melting ice. Rising seas. Rising CO2. All of these are evidence. All the various scientists involved in this data analysis know that man has caused temps to rise. They have moved far beyond the basic argument about AGW. It is so unanimous that it is not even a topic...

As an illustrative example of just how isolated Prof Bengtsson and his ilk are, consider the fact reported earlier this year by Scientific American that out of more than 2,000 peer-reviewed climate science publications put out over the last year from November 2012 to December 2013, the number of...

As an illustrative example of just how isolated Prof Bengtsson and his ilk are, consider the fact reported earlier this year by Scientific American that out of more than 2,000 peer-reviewed climate science publications put out over the last year from November 2012 to December 2013, the number of...

Ha ha ha. You're as insane as leap.

Such media misrepresentation is now par for the course. According to Forbes' denialist in residence, James Taylor, "only half of American Meteorology Society meteorologists believe global warming is occurring and humans are the primary cause" based on a new survey. The actual authors of that...

Murdoch-owned media hypes lone metereologist's climate junk science Absurd anti-science faux journalism flares up again - as usual, it's Big Oil that's set to benefit, not the public Thankfully, IOP Publishing has decided to make the full reviewer reports publicly available so that we can...

Yes debunked in your delusional world. But in the real world it really is 97%. Multiple studies and authors have shown the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change

You should not be allowed to have firearms.

12,000 peer-reviewed abstracts on the subjects of 'global warming' and 'global climate change' published between 1991 and 2011 found that of the papers taking a position on the cause of global warming, over 97% agreed that humans are causing it (Cook 2013). The scientific authors of the papers...

Jem, it's common sense. CO2 is a GHG. 40% rise due to us. Think about it for a second ..........or an hour. However long it takes a common sense thing like this to make sense to you. It really is 97% .......................and all the world's sci orgs. You are ridiculous.

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these...

No, it would be wrong to leave such ignorance and delusion unchallenged.

What a crock of total horseshit. Anyone who believes this is very ignorant. It's a collection of the usual handful of professional denialists and distortion, untruths and outright lies. To name one. We can't know the temperature of the other planets to any fine degree. We know what the sun...

That's funny. Common sense, 97% of the world's climatologists and all of it's science organizations say YOU are full of shit. I'll go with them thank you.

32,000 Sounds Like A Lot In fact, OISM signatories represent a tiny fraction (~0.3%) of all US science graduates (petition cards were only sent to individuals within the U.S) According to figures from the US Department of Education Digest of Education Statistics: 2008, 10.6 million science...

There are several claims that large numbers of scientists do not agree with the theory of climate change, the best known of which is a petition organised by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (the OISM petition). This petition now appears to be signed by over 32,000 people with a BSc...

You mean virtually the entire world's science community should be shouted down huh? Why? So you can stay happily ignorant?