Search results

I agree. Plenty of pitfalls.

I also suggest that in version 1.0 no margin should be used as it's easier to implement.In other words trading stocks only.

There are websites where you can hire feeelancers to do a specific project. I believe it's cheaper.

Do you know why US specialists (not US government, I presume) advised Japan specialists not to entomb the reactors the way they were entombed in Ukraine in Chernobyl? And why the Japan specialists agreed with them?

Does any one know why SPX performance is trailing SPY performance? SPX is up 29% for the year, but SPY is up 32%.

Correct.

Oh, that's why.

Why is it better than taking a loan? To avoid declaring bankruptcy?

$1.

It seems like $20 for (b) if you were to sell 100 (1 lot) of SPY Jan 175p $6 for (c) if you were to sell 100 (1 lot) of SPY Jan 165p

I think 3x means profit factor as defined on collective2, not risk/reward ratio as you defined it. Then it makes sense.

Why to call it 3:1 reward to risk ratio if the reward was never there?

But what if it never reaches 90 pips reward in all your setup trials.

But how do you know that you risk $1 to make $3?

I,personally, don't see the option to trade spreads at limit price. They have IBtoC2 that translates IB orders into c2 orders. Maybe that helps.

I am trying to refute your point that it's easy to manipulate collective2 systems to get the subscribers. What I am asking you is to give me example of such a technique of rewarding manipulation that will prove your point.

This one is not going to get any subscribers. Investors are not fools who easily part with their money.

Like for example?

Are you anarchist or communist? Do we need to stop living our lives for you?

Why? What is your logic? Why 3x?