Search results

Wrong. You made money taking aggressive option trades that would have given you a monster loss if MCD moved large against you within a week. In fact, you did narrowly avoid a huge loss one week that would have easily wiped out every cent you claim to have made plus much, much more. And no real...

I've put a bunch of them on ignore and decided they aren't worth my time at all. The guy has no idea what he's talking about most of the time, if we take much of what he posts at face value ( on a variety of topics, not just Canada ). Where the trolling starts and stops in unclear, he seems to...

Your trolling wasn't working out so you posted this desperate shit to save face. Sorry, just makes you look like an even bigger asshole. The level of delusion you must have to think you can speak about Canada is atrocious. My experiences and social circles in Canada dwarf yours, most people I...

Intelligent readers can see through your act and understand the absurdity of some of your claims regarding Canada. I'm not here to debate you on what Canada is or what value systems mainstream Canada has. I live that experience, you don't. What you do is experience the artificial world of office...

I don't care a whole lot about an area of IT work that is often deathly boring in nature. Perhaps this is one aspect why it pays well.

Funny how these mysterious "professionals" and yourself are stuck working in the economic cesspool that is Toronto and missing out on all those "better economic opportunities". Grass is always greener somewhere else syndrome I think. What I see is you and your colleagues are a very narrow band...

This kind of analysis is largely a waste of time; the crash of 2008/2009 was severely overdone, so the 215% is somewhat irrelevant. If one wants to compare exact time periods, today's US markets are very similar in nature to US markets in the early fall of 2011 and the Nasdaq at the end of 1997...

Ridiculous premise.

Sounds like you already got a margin call. I'm not gay, you'll have to find another boyfriend.

Presumably you are "all in" now and down 43 points minimum on everything, and have talked to your banker about mortgaging your house possibly by tomorrow. Could be an exciting life changing trade, please do keep us informed.

AAPL has a PE of 12.75, yield almost 2%, and serious technical support at the $100 level. Short of massive drops in their revenues and business ( hadn't heard of any yet ), this stock is going to be super attractive to fund managers, especially if there is rotation out of sectors like retail (...

For the record, I have no idea what "bullish arguments" I've made in 2015. Perhaps in your mind, the correction I forecast in US equities wasn't deep enough, so that is "bullish" ? Or suggesting that the TSX was getting cheap around 13000 was too "bullish" for you ? Or merely quoting government...

Ok, so you created a thread about MCD supposedly beginning a long term trend DOWN and followed it up with frequent trades SELLING WEEKLY PUTS on MCD. And you don't understand why people think this thread is stupid ?

Rational, sane way to look at AAPL : P/E 12.57, Yield 1.9%, great balance sheet Irrational : Price is "too high".

So let's get this straight. You "predicted" the SPX goes to 2130 by November but you also clearly posted that there would be a 35%++ crash imminently from these levels. This is just like your trades, you post buying triple etf longs on Oil and triple etf shorts on Oil and give us reports on...

So you are back to whining about everything again. Cue the big fonts soon I guess. You had some nerve trying to suggest the bulls would start whining when all we ever see on here is you and a few others whining about equity markets and forecasting 50% crashes any day now.

You keep saying stuff like this but the only meaningful whining I've seen for years are perma bears like you getting frustrated with markets. The conspiracy theories and doom and gloom crowd have been so out of touch it's funny. It won't be long before we get the old Fed controls the market...

Every new buy or sell should be evaluated on it's own merits. "Cost average" is irrelevant, except perhaps as a bookkeeping help.

You'd think given your UWTI experience you'd better understand why averaging down on your biggest losers is a foolish technique. "Cost average" is irrelevant, every new buy has to be evaluated as a separate trade, and simply buying more doesn't make you better off.

This illustrious poster predicts a global economic recession in as little as 12 months, despite the IMF projecting 3.1% growth in 2015 :