Search results

Yes we DO know. To a 95% confidence. To call virtually the entire world's science community fools is simply insane. To say 97% of the world's climatologists wrong is breathtakingly absurd. YOU are the fool. That is quite evident. What is your major malfunction? There is no way you are...

As the IPCC notes, "global climate models generally simulate global temperatures that compare well with observations over climate timescales ... The 1990–2012 data have been shown to be consistent with the [1990 IPCC report] projections, and not consistent with zero trend from 1990 ... the...

The models have certainly NOT failed. Once again jerm is just plain wrong.

atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in 15 to 20 million years (Tripati 2009). A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20.000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years. but hold the presses, piehole thinks it's normal.

Annual global CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning and cement manufacture in GtC yr?1 (black), annual averages of the 13C/12C ratio measured in atmospheric CO2 at Mauna Loa from 1981 to 2002 (red). ). The isotope data are expressed as ?13C(CO2) ‰ (per mil) deviation from a calibration...

Get ready for a pile of bullshit from piehole.

We don't need isotope analysis to know that we have raised the levels 40%. It happened exactly when man started burning things and we know how much we put into the air and we know how fast the biosphere utilizes it. It's common sense, which you don't want to have in this subject, for some reason.

A survey of 928 peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003 shows that not a single paper rejected the consensus position that global warming is man caused (Oreskes 2004). A follow-up study by the Skeptical Science team of over 12,000...

bump, for jerm

If you want to be taken seriously you need to come out right now and say that you don't believe in AGW.

Yes the levels of CO2 are like the setting on the thermostat. Very good So anyone with the slightest amount of intellectual integrity Leaves you out. You believe in AGW but pretend you don't.

Yeah, plus it's harder to delude the educated.

Of course the dems are wealthier. They are smarter. The GOP dolts don't even believe in science.

Just come out and agree. You don't think man has caused global warming. Go ahead. Lie. Get it out of your system/.

Yes, why the hell are you playing games like this. its a waster of time. You personally believe in man made global warming but pretend you don't. Such a liar.

1. Yes it is irrelevant. That was then this is now. I don't know why you such a problem with this concept. The fact that this is not the first time that temps have risen in no way changes the fact that today we have raised the levels of CO2 and thereby temps. Your "logic" is simply not...

Yes, why the hell are you playing games like this. its a waster of time. You personally believe in man made global warming but pretend you don't. Such a liar.