Search results

  1. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    Yes, when someone is known asshole, like you, I think that has some bearing on how seriously to take them. Like you for instance, not at all. You don't even believe the shit you say. You believe in AGW.
  2. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley is "a caricature English peer",[2] former deputy leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP)[3] and a climate change denier. He constitutes an excellent argument in favour of revolutionary socialism...
  3. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    And I still wonder why piehole goes to the least respected names in climate science (although Monckton is not even a scientist) while avoiding the 97% and the most obvious common sense science all while referring to a known denier site bought and paid for by the denier machine. Petterson...
  4. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    The April 30, 2012 New York Times article included the comments of several other experts. Christopher S. Bretherton, an atmospheric researcher at the University of Washington, said Lindzen is "feeding upon an audience that wants to hear a certain message, and wants to hear it put forth by people...
  5. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    I wonder why you mention Lindzen and not any one of the other 97% of climate scientists that are not climate misinformers. I think you would agree that my degree in environmental science and my immersion in the topic for last ten years makes me more qualified and knowledgable about AGW than...
  6. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    First tell me that you don't believe in AGW and I'll answer you. Is it that hard?
  7. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    You keep saying nothing. To say that the spike in CO2 that occurred right when man started burning stuff might not be from man is absurd to say the least. Have you or jerm any common sense? Logic?
  8. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    So basically you admit that you are talking out of your ass while throwing around some science words in pseudo intellectual masturbation. All the while trying to sound impressive. Thank you. And the one name you bring up Lindzen, is an ass. You're a piece of work. Wow, just wow. For...
  9. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    And why is the earth's temperature doing this......sure doesn't like it's stopped warming
  10. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    Bottom line. The warming trend has not been broken. The earth is still warming and the models have certainly not failed. This chart shows that clearly. Only by cherry picking points over a short time period on a noisy chart can one show no warming. This chart clearly shows that warming...
  11. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    I don't think jerm understands anything about charts/trends moving averages etc. It makes one wonder how he is able to trade. He probably watches a losing position get worse and worse on the chart and doesn't know why his account is losing money. I mean, I've showed him charts like this...
  12. F

    Sniper finishes off 6 Muslims with ONE bullet.

    Thank God they were Muslims and not some asshole righty.
  13. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    So then you admit that you believe in AGW.
  14. F

    NC State Global Warming Professor accused of "recklessly falsified work"

    The funny thing is that jerm actually does believe in AGW. Basically he is arguing the devil's advocate position to support his crazed ant-govt ideological ideology.
  15. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    Given this, Bray and von Storch (2010) does not rebut, or call into question the results of Cook et al (2013). What it does do, or should do, is put a brake on the misinterpretation of Cook et al as showing that 97% of climate scientists endorse the consensus. Cook et al does not show that, and...
  16. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    Most claims that the IPCC models have failed are based on surface temperature changes over the past 15 years (1998–2012). During that period, temperatures have risen about 50 percent more slowly than the multi-model average, but have remained within the range of individual model simulation...
  17. F

    How a troll is allowed to destroy a forum section

    I think he's great. Anything to counter the overwhelming stupidity of the right wing morons that infest this sit.
  18. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    IPCC AR5 Figure 1.4. Solid lines and squares represent measured average global surface temperature changes by NASA (blue), NOAA (yellow), and the UK Hadley Centre (green). The colored shading shows the projected range of surface warming in the IPCC First Assessment Report (FAR; yellow), Second...
  19. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    You're so full of shit jerm. You believe in AGW. So why are you putting up fraudulent statistics, charts and lying? Why?
  20. F

    Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

    Isotope schistatope. It's a red herring and unnecessary to see the truth.
Back
Top