Search results

Did you check the "food" in your colon? If flexible and not with too big a belly, one could widen legs and move nose to the exit port...

Same thing can be said about the numbers Romney was throwing during the debate.

Why they do not sue him for the "fair market value" part? What are the penalties if guilty? If the current president were republican, his attorney general would have already been after the case.

He was talking to insurance companies --- a plan that would improve your bottom line and profits! CEOs may have read between his lines "With my plan you will harvest profits on the day I am elected".

This is the nail in the coffin of the R&R ticket. One R could become a car salesman, the other R hopefully would not continue for too long damaging America from his chair in the hill.

The president is practically elected with today's job numbers.

Romney is a liar. Everyone knows that. The President has left Romney define Romney's lies live on prime time. Now he has to punch him on the nose, and hit him hard at the next debate and in stump speeches, so that america would not see a liar appearing in future debates.

Why didn't the president go after Romney's taxes and the 47%? Was it by design, and if so why? I thought that maybe the President wanted to let Romney do his dance and define Romney by Romney's words, and knock him out in the second debate. This would have other benefits: a lower profile...

You are right!

I think Romney's performance would not change the polls, and might set him for a loss at the next debate as the expectation would go higher on him, particularly if what he gave is his best shot.

Romney interrupted the President a bit too much. It helped him to appear more energetic, but it came at the cost of being too aggressive and even hostile. The President was not aggressive, which has helped him to be gracious and Presidential, but at the cost of being less energetic. Maybe he...

The president was great in the area of taxes, and in highlighting the lack of specifics by Romney.

Who won the debate?

Jim Lehrer is a good man, and old enough that he has no benefits except siding with truth.

Is Woodward a zionist? Zionism wants the President defeated, because Romney is good for the zionism agenda. So Woodward could be saying the opposite of what he really thinks. Why would one do that? Because they may think it would benefit their candidate if people believe it.

No mention of who the rioters are? Are they money changers who made a wrong bet? If yes I would understand why Joe W did not mention it. Is Joe Weisenthal a zionist? Any effects of zionism in the story?

They offer it because it is of benefit to them, and they make compared to paying with the green back.

Few people would understand what you seem you already understand. If I can be blunt, some people may not have the ability to understand certain things.

And who used it? Yes, the republicans to save the banks/wall street! In there is a lesson on who is shouldering the burden of america. In addition, every dollar paid (in the form of taxes/profits/bailouts/etc) comes from the consumer. Moreover, wealth is created by workers, not by businesses...

#2: They figure out that Paul Rayan is actually not Ron Paul, and that Romney may have used the "name-similarity" to harvest Ron Paul's politcal capital.