Search results

I think you have something else in your mouth. You implied that someone with 100% allocation to META made moar monies. Wow, that's simply brilliant. They also carried far greater risk. These people that bought it on Jan 1, 2023. A Sunday. You would have taken credit for the 1/1 purchase...

Dump Truck, ofc they count. The day's PNL on your front end will give you that figure, based upon a futures settlement or the mark to the position on equity/FI. Did they teach you something else in prison? I suspect you didn't count the loots until that carton of Kools were safely under your bunk!

You implied that you bought it on 1/1/2023 -> then I posted that it landed on a Sunday -> you got smoked, again.

Then you're r3tarded.

lol dude you stated you bought it on Sunday to the limits of your account. You got the YTD-return wrong. You've been trading an account with 100% allocation to META. Post another YT video!

How long do you need to photoshop the proof that you bought it on Sunday 1/1?

So the only point was to source a ticker that performed well YTD, that you don't own, and that you didn't allocate 100% to the position. My point is that you are borderline functional (you're welcome) as it's meaningless to state you own META as the 83% is only significant to the discussion of...

Shares are up 73%, not 83%. I love these hindsight positions at 100% commitment!

I am still wondering how VinnySim put 100% of his trading account in META on a Sunday, 1/1/2023. I was hoping he'd take ownership of that one. It's a cool story, though.

TheDawn writes: To me, not allowing short selling is the biggest manipulation of the market and runs most contrary to the free market. I mean buying and selling are two sides of the same coin, two equally important trading actions that create an active market. How can they allow one to buy a...

lol each broker in the US does not work differently. Regulations prohibit it in cash markets (equities don’t have futures markets). You cannot be long and short the same security in a single account, so you must structure the position as a box/roll or conversion (reversal) You were short a...

‘ofc.

So you're suggesting that you cannot use open position gains to determine PNL? You Sir, are mentally challenged. Finn beats you every day, but in this case it's not stating very much.

Yeah, he usually carries overnight positions.

The vol-marks are unreliable AH as TDA marks the options to their posted bids on longs, and offers on shorts, so the marks always suffer after hours. Plus he has various micro futures and down a little on long futures (hedges). I'd have to look.

Finn approved this release, but his account is down AH on after hours marks on the options. He was up 495ish when I posted the earlier screen grab from my iPad. A switch lock is a tenor-arb (between 2-3 expirations) which is predictive of post-event (earnings) vol; where it lands. He's not...

lol I was up 0.52. He's up 1.3-5. hahaha, he corrected me.

Only 165 to go.

I dunno. 41K'ish so he's up about $200-$220. I don't have it in front of me. He's in something called a switch lock in TSLA (my idea) and TQQQ vol hedged with QQQ. About 50% allo. He's up 52% year to date.

MsDawn's logorrhea: Yes but you would've incurred huge losses on the long position and no sustained profit from the short because there is no independent short position; it's just unloading some long, unless I am missing something here? What aren't you missing? Trader STCs the long in one...