Search results

Is it wrong all I notice is her rack..

Watch the video and tell me if the cops were warranted for walking all the way over to beat up the guy with the cell phone.

You did not see the video because of your comments. The 3 guys were standing far away and staying out of the way with their cell phones. There really was not any audible cursing that was warranted to be beaten down and arrested. So since the officers were not being interfered with we all...

Seems they believe in limited government only when it suits them, not some grand vision. It is all or nothing when you say, don't tell me who I can serve, hire or fire, but please give me all the benefits I am entitled to. Libertarians fall under the hypocrite wing in most of their comments.

Police arresting a driver decide to go over to his friends who are recording it with their cell phones and knock them down and arrest them for "cussing in public" https://nypost.com/2020/06/05/texas-men-busted-for-cursing-while-questioning-friends-arrest/ Please convince me that cops are so...

Irrelevant to the topic and discussion and they were private citizens vandalizing a statute. Nothing is going to dig you out of the wrong hole you dug and then buried yourself in...

If a company wants the freedom to be able to fire people based solely on race or sexual orientation and claim freedom from government intervention then they should not be hypocrites and free themselves from all government intervention. That means no license to operate within the State, no...

The dissent in this case really went out on a stretch to dissent from this case....like it took real effort to find a way to allow employers to fire someone JUST because they are gay. Like I always said..numerous women got their jobs by sucking dick and no one had a problem with it but if a guy...

The dissenters in the gay firing cases basically punted big time... The dissenting justices criticized the majority for projecting what they see as a new meaning on a decades-old law. Alito argued that it is unlikely that lawmakers in 1964 would have sought to protect gay or transgender people...

Did this really have to go all the way to the SC...its like...no shit.

Dude....it is not in the power of the County to pick and choose, these are State wide requirements and since you were questioning the source I found a county as an example. NC Board of Instruction is for the State. One county cannot say "Meh I don't feel like teaching that..."

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools https://www.wsfcs.k12.nc.us/Page/91214 American History 1 Curriculum Page 9

Citation:

I did.......now please demonstrate your Back Up Kung Fu

Uh.....now I need you to take the scanned page and go to the text book printer and have them issue a certified letter that this is in fact a page and not something a Wizard from Hogwarts conjured up in his "I Cry Bullshit when Facts are Presented"

Uh now I need you to go to NC and pull a textbook from a kid's hand and scan it and post the scanned page here to prove that NC students learn about Gettysburg and the Civil War...

UH you never provided a link so I can cry about it not being trueee UH you provided a link but I am never wrong so I will just ignore the link...

Uh PAGE 40 in the link in case you want to cry that I never gave you the page to show you the facts that prove your claim is bullshit.

Oh SHIT! GWB is wrong and all he has is "WAH you did not provide a link! WAH!" THE CITE IS IN THE FUCKING DOCUMENT!!!!!! READ IT! http://socstu.ncwiseowl.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_4508142/File/SS%20Documents/ushistorysupportdoc2007.pdf Game over. CHALLENGE: PROOF THAT NC TEAHCES...