Search results

Naked puts on stocks or on futures?

We will close higher but we shouldn't.

Don't delude yourself. The market will finish higher.

Don't jinx it.

Right, the wider the uptick the better. As a matter of fact it should be so wide that even anaconda won't get a fill. So much for taking advantage of the uptick inefficiency.

Down-tick rule works even better for you. Maybe you need to start lobbying for this one.

The data on the chart makes sense for all previous years. So why the calculations on the chart in your opinion are way off for this year? They have to be consistent with the previous results. Meaning they had to use same type of calculations across the board.

What about some healthy correction? Will we get one on the way?

Judging by how they drag their feet I am pretty much under impression that they are reluctant to do so. I personally believe that they must act based on the principles of the free markets and the issue is not for referendum. The fact that they are asking for the public comments just proves that...

I hope that they will let the short-sellers sell at market price at least twice a day: at MOO and MOC.

I've googled "petition online" and I've found bunch of them: www.thepetitionsite.com www.petitiononline.com www.ipetitions.com

There are no textbooks for the pocket pickers but still there are other ways to pass the trade secrets to a novice.

They are plenty of people with the balls. They can learn the art of trading all right. Consider your example of dentistry as a profession: If I know I don't have what it takes to become a dentist that does not mean that no other people can be taught dentistry.

Even if the records won't be broken anyone can run though even not at the record speed.

I didn't say it can be replicated by anyone I meant it can be done by someone else. So, yes, other people can be taught playing poker and trading markets though with a different degree of success. Just as any other profession.

Anything that was done by a man can be replicated by another man.

How about a collective letter that I believe many will sign?

It takes the reverse engineering to see your point.

That's why Cramer is a Wall St. showman not a fund manager.

Have any of you guys sent your comments to SEC? I guess majority of you should be against the rule, right?