Search results

I enjoyed this from Moniod: (A) I really don't understand why one independent trader needs to evaluate another independent trader. Is it because for a trader to agree with another trader, one needs confirmation that a trader is really a successful trader? Imagine the situation we would run into...

So where does one buy and where does one sell? If he doesn't know, he should start here.

And how do you know that Raschke and Schwartz are "real traders"? Have you seen their P&Ls? :) Since she's given you permission to call her "linda", surely she's shared that information with you.

http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/the-trouble-with-scribbles.290602/page-23#post-4109147

Actually they have little to do with each other, but I see no point in recycling the same old arguments as you haven't read the material either. Anyone who wants to read those arguments can do a search.

Actually, it has practically nothing to do with PA. It is based on indicators and fear. But if you want to believe that it's identical to PA, you certainly have the right to believe whatever you choose.

There is that. I'm going to have less and less time for this.

Well, tomorrow is the 20th chart. We'll see. There's nothing I can do about the interference, but it doesn't keep me up at night. I've been in the market since before most of these people were born. However, those who are interested do get tired of wading through all the troll nonsense. Again...

Likewise. Thanks so much for stopping by. Drive carefully.

You can't always get what you want. But sometimes, if you try . . .

I'm not sure if it matters since the troll bus seems to have arrived. On the other hand, getting into trade management and risk management often gets into areas that people aren't always comfortable with on a public message board. But I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have about...

Why does it matter? If you're genuinely interested, you can find my two most recent trades yourself by studying the pdf and plotting them on a 1m NQ chart. If you're not, I don't have the time to waste on it.

If you ever have a slow evening, Vad Graifer and I got along nicely. He is, of course, not here anymore. His name was Threei. It doesn't search well, but if you search for Graifer, you can find them (only 373 of them).

It's incomplete until the individual trader determines what for him constitutes a confirmation. Only someone who cannot think for himself at all would want somebody else to tell him what to do. And even then he most likely wouldn't take the trade anyway because he'd be afraid to. Or, if he did...

Oh, I suppose it may have something to do with all the charts of those who are working with the SLA/AMT that BS yanked out of their journals and reposted here for the sole purpose of ridiculing their efforts. Otherwise, no special reason. If BS hadn't started all this, it's unlikely I ever...

Why does it matter?

Not necessarily. Jem the Obscure leaves out all the Roman effort to conquer the known world, including the Middle East. And they didn't do it for Zeus.

Because you haven't listened to anything I've said. Hope you enjoy continued success.

No need to post it twice. Just makes it longer. As for motives, you left out the part where the Templar Knights cleaned up. -- resident big govt loving Christian-hypocrite hater

I wonder if Rubio is going to get a hair weave or stick with the combover?