Search results

  1. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    S2007S has had an equally bad forecasting history. How many more posts will he put up saying markets are "free money" and going up but predicting a giant collapse as well ( which indicates a risk ) ? How often will he post about his triple bull ETFs going up when his net account position is...
  2. N

    Why Is The Obvious Not So Obvious?

    Uh, buddy, I told you what the OP was on about already. It's all bs, a bunch of pointless riddles. Apparently your radar on these things is pretty weak.
  3. N

    Marketsurfer says short shake shack

    So what you are claiming is you'd have covered your short at $40 a share based on your valuation ? So tell me, on your frequent claims that the S&P is going to crash in the future, at what level would you cover on your "crash trade". Be specific. Let's get your numbers ahead of time to eliminate...
  4. N

    Why Is The Obvious Not So Obvious?

    Do you really grant strangers this kind of open invitation to speak in riddles and not answer anything at all ? Perhaps the OP has stopped posting because his used car lot is getting busier or he has to call a few people about a "free timeshare vacation". Maybe he's located in Nigeria and needs...
  5. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    I stated that Canada had "QE" in 2009. We followed the US lead, even helped bail out GM. The Canadian government reacted in 2009 to the uncertainty of the worldwide economy that year. It became apparent though by 2010 that we as a country weren't really in a US sized crisis, that our banks were...
  6. N

    Why Is The Obvious Not So Obvious?

    This thread was basically the ET version of a con job. I'm amazed how many got fooled by the OP who was merely trolling the board for fun. One could speak in riddles on almost any topic and persuade some that something magical is being spoken about. Kind of like dealing with Ouiji board, the...
  7. N

    Marketsurfer says short shake shack

    Your promotion of your ideas is as per usual way overdone. What on earth is a "historic short" ? There are thousands of companies that will eventually go out of business; identifying one fairly new company that does so is not historic in the slightest.
  8. N

    Marketsurfer says short shake shack

    You seem to be mostly a promoter/sales type guy then anyone to be taken seriously. It is delusional for you to think that a personal visit to one location is meaningful at all, regardless of SHAK's merits.
  9. N

    Marketsurfer says short shake shack

    By your logic, growing companies that are losing money are worthless, when this is often not the case. P/E is only a meaningful stat on an established, somewhat mature company. You seem to simply look for numbers that confirm your extreme bearish outlook on EVERYTHING in the world. Perhaps it is...
  10. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    You obviously know very little about Canada and have simply regurgitated a few themes you read on the internet. There is no common sense behind how you've tried to connect the dots here. I don't say this to argue the points or debate the topic, I'm rather shocked by the lack of understanding...
  11. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    I have noticed your source is Zerohedge on this; I would suggest to you not to take very much you read from them at face value. Take a look at national debt to GDP numbers since 2008, and put them in historical context. None of those numbers suggest a financial system out of control. I suppose...
  12. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    MSFT had $22B in pure profit the last year. That's an interesting number.
  13. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    I'm not sure what you mean by stealth QE and which countries program you are referring to. One could assume that US QE had an indirect impact on Canada, but I would argue it's not as big as some might think as evidenced by the different experiences the two countries had. Because I live here I...
  14. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    The idea that what has occurred in the US is happening everywhere is wrong. For example, Canada has the following key differences since 2009 : absolutely no housing correction or crash ( the contrary actually ), no banking crisis, and no QE like programs except for some limited projects in 2009...
  15. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    Not at all. I suppose to the conspiracy theory junkies who think the US fed buys equities to prop up markets, it might make sense that QE is required at all times. But that's a fantasy. QE is not a program designed to prevent corrections in bull markets. So many of the posts on this site are...
  16. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    S2007S would never let reality impact on his delusions. For example, many months ago I told him that there would likely be no QE4 in the US in 2015. He has since claimed numerous times that QE4 is coming. So on January 1st, 2016, we will know for sure if QE4 occurred in 2015 in the US. He will...
  17. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    So much bs from you. In October 2009, you were extremely bearish on US equities. You said the S&P would definitely go below 1000 and possibly test 600. So apparently, you were entirely clueless about the bull market. Clueless for at least 5 years as evidenced by your posts on this site. So...
  18. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    S&P up 2.3% in 2015. Or around 0.6% per month. Please get some perspective.
  19. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    EXCUSE ME, THIS IS YOUR REALITY CHECK : S&P is up 2.3% in 2015 ... basically a flat market. Now please review your posts and determine if you tend to overreact emotionally to basically everything. Late in the dot com bubble, the Nasdaq went up almost 90% in one year. PLEASE LEARN SOME...
  20. N

    Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

    I must have been distracted by the all too frequent criticisms of Bernanke and chastising of the "fools" that get referenced by S2007S. Doesn't sound like love to me.
Back
Top