Search results

One at a time; that is why it is so good. Your posts are actually more than anyone can resonably expect. And they are so timely, even for people with short attention spans.

making money has to do with price movement. This is price going up and down all of the time. the optimum can be stated by using a standard of measure. the standard of measure that you use can be anything. the rest of this post for you will be something else. My glider cost about...

Please go to spyder's post; he has covered to bases there. I couldn't resist. lol

New reference chart attached.

Thanks so much for posting. i especially liked the commentary on the "always in the market" aspects. This is an objection that comes up when people are entry/exit orientated. Going to the hold/reversal is difficult. John Letto, who is famous for metals and poker and setting the vegas...

LOL For a minute I though you were posting the trade.

Use this as a good response to thunderdog.

I spent an hour articulating the pros and cons of this post and lost it when butterscotch stepped on my keyboard...lol... too bad. I'll pass on this. It will be evident to many, I'm sure, what the consequences are of approaching SCT with this sort of orientation.. Too bad i lost it would...

Items 1 through 7 do not work because of human limitations. The OP is saying that in his own words with every post one way or another. Look up some psychological stuff and then make a routine assessment of why these human failures are going on. You have to turn to an orientation of...

There is a tradition as you problably have figured out. As you become acquainted and are making trips to meet with others who trade, you get better acquainted with their effectiveness and effeciency and how far they have gotten into the optimization. As it turns out there are other aids that...

here is the attachment. It timed out last try.

Here is an attachment of the Objections to SCT so far. About 2 dozen. I left a space below each opne for anyone who takes notes. If you are considering SCT this will be a good place to determine why not to give it any further consideration. The OP is an example for you. He says his...

You can do what you want. I have been doing what I do the same way for quite a while. I don't express what I do too much. Maybe someday some scientists can begin to evaluate how high velocity traders, in general, trade. Then maybe they can move on to some really fun stuff. I do not...

This is a very good clue for you. I would follow your instincts. This is not a "take away"; it just isn't a good idea for you to follow up on.

I parsed this in color below. I can understand that you needs some rest and that you have to pace yourself a little. It was good to see the first 25 or so objections get on the table. they are very powerful things to anyone to consider. I think we may be able to get the ratio back up to...

What you say may be true for you, but it isn't for me. At some pint you will use some math to determine that scanning involves a finite number of cominations of elements of data sets. the sets are in three basic sizes and there is a sufficiency aspect too that lessens the sizes...

That's right good observation. Post the answers to your Q's when you get a chance. Show links as well it will hepl others.

SCT works and it is testable right down to the finest detail as you will find out this year in an orderly way. I am glad you are backing off on the testing; that is a good move on your part.

help doli out. You are informed and he is unable to do anyhing for himself. Add the pertinent columns he needs so people can fill in the facts that he is seeking. This is a time to have first hand knowledge posted if a person chooses. Soon he will have excel and google on his computer so...

I am going to be very fair with you. You can see that I have been quite fair in every way so far. You have objections. They relate to SCT. If and when you get down to the precise math and science of what your objections are, they will be addressed in spades. I am not here to provide...