Search results

Another Fave Star Rated Thread. Welcome back. Nice to see you posting again. - Spydertrader

I do have a Lateral beginning with the ES 11:30 [close of] Bar, but I chose to 'move' the annotation 'out of the way' in order to avoid any confusion about the area under discussion. I apologize if by 'moving' the annotation temporarily, I added to your confusion. The 'pace jump' as you put...

Evidently, a less than satisified visitor to a certain chat room has chosen to author a cautionary tale ... - Spydertrader

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2073860>

In case you hadn't noticed, you already provided an answer to your question - within your post. :D However, in case I have misunderstood the various times listed, have I highlighted the correct bar in the attached snippet? If I have, then you have placed a Point One where a Point Two needs...

You can almost feel the panic in the market today. - Spydertrader

http://www.nestersoft.com/timeleft/

Cup Series Current Standings <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2072167>

And he had it right in more ways than one. Note where he placed 'Sequence Three' on his chart, prior to, its actual arrival. Dominant, non-dominant, Dominant. Sequence One, Two and Three. - Spydertrader

Shouldn't be too much longer before you'll be headed full time. Nicely done. - Spydertrader

Geez, this is like pulling teeth. - Spydertrader

So begin your sequences with the first bar not contained within the Lateral, what context changes result over those three change signal bars now? Where does the actual signal for change result? Which method of annotation (with or without lateral) does the market indicate as correct? -...

Red Highlight was the answer I was looking for. Review Friday's Chart. It happened twice. - Spydertrader

Do the exercises I outlined. Note the differences. Note the similarities. Of all the laterals you discussed in your post, only one begins with a Signal of Change. By annotating the lateral forward of The ES 10:55 [close of] Bar and following the sequences, then doing the same without a...

Think for a moment. Does increasing Volume always indicate dominance? Certainly, you can already name three instances where Price moves from Point Two to Point Three on increasing Volume, yet moving Point Two to Point Three clearly represents Price moving in a non-dominant direction. The key...

You do not need my charts in order to learn how to 'see' that which currently eludes your grasp. The market hands back corrected exams at the end of each trading day. Grade your paper. Note where errors occured, then, determine why they occurred. The debrief process shows everyone exactly where...

One Bar represents a 'trough' with respect to volume, and the other represents a return to dominance. I chose those three bars for a very specific reason. Your question, prior to, my words directing you to these bars questioned the value of adding a Lateral beginning at The ES 10:55 [close...

Same Day that I posted (possibly the day before). Whatever you feel best suits your needs. However, I have noticed a certain progression which occurs whenever you walk though things 'out loud' in the thread. It would be a shame to see you abondon that which has provided you a benefit in the...

Incorrect. The ES 10:10 [close of] Bar signals that the market has yet to leave the non-dominant mode, and as such, has not yet completed its sequence. Since no mode change occured on the ES 10:10 [close of] Bar, The ES 10:15 [close of] Bar shows an increase in Pace (rather than Peak Volume)...

Because both the ES 10:10 [close of] Bar and the ES 10:15 [close of] Bar have signaled, "The market hasn't yet finished moving laterally." - Spydertrader