You hear that Xspurt, any chance you can do clear timely non ambiguous before the fact call with zero obfuscation ? :D
Here are a couple of mine, I would buy Dow Puts above 15000 cash, would also buy GLD puts above 1500 (GC).
Now you catching up :)
He uses ET for prey, posts and acts like a trading God until someone falls for the whole fiasco and contacts him for private tutoring.
Everything else is advertising, without paying the sponsorship of course.
Holy shit, this guy cannot be for real.
Why stop at $500 a point, when the forex realm can handle much more ?
You use the magic of compounding SheMaleGenius!
The point is that 40 pips consistently every day in a market with superb liquidity and superb leverage amounts to billions within the scope of one lifetime.
And all possible from a guy that cannot call a trade in advance without being ambiguous ?
BULLSHIT
Trading consistently profitable is possible, no argument there, and even using TA, I'm not marketsurfer.
Trading consistently and bagging in excess of 40pips a day without a losing day, is a feat that would take you above Bill Gates level in a reasonable amount of time, in a market that has...
Ever heard the saying that if you lie enough times about something you might end up believing the lie yourself?
Would not be surprised if the "Xspurt of Ambiguity" is hitting that stage as we speak, crazy vendor man. That 20,000 ES comment probably a new marketing scheme, just like 40 pips...
Consistently in a market with massive liquidity it truly is outrageous because it allows you to print money over a small amount of time, which is why everyone here is taking you for a FAKE except your lemmings of course who have already been brainwashed by the "Xspurt of Ambiguity".
It sure does.
We either got people like Xspurt who considers himself a guru yet won't give you a clear trade before the fact, only ambiguity that can work both ways, or Marketsurfer who has no problem whatsoever making things transparent, hats off to him
It's nice to see someone of the...
All this bullshit and long paragraphs could be avoided with a continuous statement and not hand picked days, but of course, its "Xspurt", expert in ambiguity.
In reference to "Xspurt" The Vendor's rookie.
The bad day probably a product of irresponsible trading that went wrong.
The good day, could had been a product of irresponsible trading that went right and he is using the scenario to pump his business.
I see no evidence of consistency in...