Search results

Thank you. No, there isn't anything particularly complicated about it. If you can draw a straight line . . . You should look at the pdf. It's a lot less painful than dragging yourself through all these posts.

1775. By next month, 1800. If you want to know why, tho, you'll have to refer to the material.

I could tell you, but then you'd want an explanation. It's easier to just read the material. It's only about three pages without the charts.

Your second is what I have. I guess we'll find out via price behavior which one is correct if and when price gets there. It's also worth noting that a 10% correction would take us to 3366. Edit: I've added the "top" appendix to the SLA-AMT and have uploaded it. Just use the link you have.

This may be helpful as far as the "what do I want" process is concerned. However, if you already know that you want something automated, this eliminates a vast amount of material that would otherwise waste a lot of your time. There is an automated trading forum here that might be right up your...

According to AMT, enter reversals off the extremes, long off the lower, short off the upper, as was the case this morning. As to other charts, it's simply a matter of drawing the trend channels to determine the upper and lower limits. The SLA-AMT pdf explains it in detail, with charts. Since...

First chart to the left is what I posted this morning before the jobs report. Middle chart is the same chart after the NY close. As you can see, price reached the upper limit of the trend channel and, according to AMT, reversed. Price then fell to the lower limit of the trend channel and...

I like Wyckoff Monster myself. :) All this did originate with him, after all.

It's at the apex of a hinge. That's about it.

.

.

One of the chief advantages of the scientific method, if conducted properly, is to avoid bias, particularly confirmation bias (1) and in-group bias (2): 1. Confirmation Bias This is a fatal flaw of trading; we tend to surround ourselves with information that validates our own point of view...

These are the sorts of hypotheses that can be backtested if formulated properly. If, for example, one looks at DTs within the context of AMT, he'll be taking only those that are at or near an extreme and comparing the results with those obtained by taking all DTs without regard to where they...

Your thoughts? No. I trade off context. That's why I start with the weekly, then daily, then hourly. I don't want to trade in the middle of nowhere. If you can do it, tho, more power to you.

That's the sort of question that backtesting is designed to answer.

There's no difference in what you replay, but the larger intervals are so much easier. However, it's up to you.

In real time with real money.

But why 1m? Why not hourly? It's all the same, but at least you'll be able to trade the hourly for real.

I must have missed this somewhere along the line but I didn't know you had a job. Why on earth are you working in a 1m interval?

Since the jobs reports will be coming out at 0830, I'll be in chat early. There may be a trade or there may not, but it's worth being there a half hour early.