Search results

Hmm... A bit curious since my beliefs are somewhat geared to the assumption that many things require getting over the learning curve hump. My FinMath is limited to structured finance, and I'm always looking to add books to my reference shelf. Specifically, what categories of geometry theory are...

Having sat in a few MBA classes at the ivory tower, this material is not even on their radar yet. Who's radar would this be on? I only wish I had the time to think this way. Surely the math here will look unreal to most. It is a limitation of perception for sure. I crunched these numbers... The...

absolutely great point. Both have great qualities as mentioned by a few posters. Unfortunately, I have neither. However, I am pursuing a masters for the sake of having one. As you see in this thread, several are looking backwards instead of looking forward. Then there are have nots speaking...

Absolutely agree here... Negative correlations would state that the two systems would have a cancelling result on the aggregate of their returns. NEAT! Thanks. At the moment, I have several automated systems and prob a dozen others scattered across several dozen notebooks of scribbling and...

The correlation calculation here is straight forward. With correlation tho, I presume that the objective would be that as more systems were added, ideally the N systems would have ZERO pairwise correlation. Otherwise, for highly correlated systems, it would simply be better to opt for the...

NEAT! Your chart just gave me another SCT idea... This is why I have to close my lab doors some times. Otherwise, too many lanes on the highway become available... MAK!

Your unique effort is absolutely paramount. The "can't be taken away aspect" is when you experience the plateau (ie. no more falling thru the ice), it is a point where you in fact know that how you are operating is something that will never fail to be effective nor will it fail to deliver, quite...

Carryovers are only some of the time. You draw them (Pre-Open) when they are there. Otherwise it is a glance at the ST/IT channel and restart of a new intraday channel. For the interim, I am in the lab doing some DD on a few items. Also, my screen time at present is limited (domestic and...

Just a comment since this is contrary to the docs I read in msdn... http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=861902#post861902 Kind Regards, MAK!

Here's a small snip that I pulled from msdn. The article was specifically geared to address why RTD as opposed to DDE. It seams that the following points are pretty clear about RTD's functionality...

K... So I bit, chewed, and swallowed. The quotein is neat, robust, and presumably suited for non techs/quants/programmers. The gap is apparently in RTD or perhaps quoteins built-in RTD server. Even when setting the throttle to 0 (ie. show every tick), there were still gaps in the T&S. The...

21... MAK!

YUCK... WASH! BO on ES 5M lat... MAK!

GO/NO GO/KNOW TO GO! Current considerations. Lateral on ES, Channels on YM. Laterals are S&R territory. Channels are PV. FBO possible on YM...

ON YM... here. YUCKY! After toying with charts, I've thrown in the str/squ stuff using overlapping charts. Been assimilating for a couple of days. Still getting calibrated.... HMMM FTT on YM... MAK!

Just a quickie on this, projections are not taken with outside bars (ie. 5 & 7, 6 & 8). There is a comment about this somewhere along the link I posted wrt to outside bar projections... There is also a remark regarding double projected reversals... These are just comments, otherwise PM Grob your...

CAREFUL! :cool: I draw 99% of my channels in realtime as they occur! The other 1% is the higher fractals. If there were a print out of all the charts, the minor adjustments across my charts would be infrequent and comparable. It is evident especially in the daily fractal charts I post. I go...

Drifting...

I'm working to get out of whifty (ie. "what if"), despite being relaxed. 38... MAK!

I had another AHA the other day so I am assimilating. I am carefully following along as a means to contribute as opposed to influence. 17... MAK!