Search results

Isn't it ironic that the person not spouting out insults is the person who gets put on ignore? Doesn't that tell you something?

Oh please, do tell.

The fact that I don't think naked shorting is equivalent to actual rape makes me a pussy? The more you talk, the more you lose credibility.

So you think talking about rape should be in the same thread as naked shorting? Don't you think that makes you look crazy?

So just to complete this logic as it pertains to this thread, if somebody leaks the information from the Cramer show beforehand and the people who know this information buy before the show and sell into the surge during the show, why is this not a pump and dump? Why isn't it illegal?

So what if it wasn't me doing the buying and selling but someone that I knew that I told about the information beforehand? Would that be considered a "pump and dump"?

Just one more angle - I find this interesting: so suppose I get this huge following on my free newsletter, i.e., I become the 2nd Cramer and people treat me like I am some sort of stock god. And I know based on past experience that within 1 minute of putting a recommendation on my website, that...

Man, if that is true, the definition of insider trading seems bizarre to me. I guess the trick is to get a big following (make a few good calls) in my free newsletter. Then from then on, just trade in front of all my articles. If I were viewing it as an impartial observer, I would definitely...

I wouldn't charge for it either. Would that make it ok? http://www.northcountrygazette.org/articles/051206GrandJuryLeak.html

Are you positive about this? So I could run an upgrade/downgrade service and have my family trade on my touts before anyone else (or the moment I put them up on a website somewhere)? Then it wouldn't be illegal?

Do you really think this kind of comment wins your argument? Don't you think it makes you appear a little irrational? Why would anyone take you seriously?

Getting information about a tout before everyone else is illegal right? I mean, didn't they bust the postman who was looking at the advanced copies of BusinessWeek a long time ago? How is this any different? Not that I trust the SEC to get anything right.

Oh crap, this means it's going to be worse than 1987.

You can insult me all you want when I bring up valid points that bring some balance to your one-sided arguments. I can call you names too if you would prefer. Oh gee! Then it must be right!

I definitely understand the dynamic and I understand why naked shorting should be exterminated. But I also think it provides a convenient excuse for companies to point to in case their core business are going down the tubes. Failure is an important part of capitalism and companies that suck...

Infinite supply is an exaggeration, don't you think? Another point I'd like to throw out there is that for some of these companies, the correct price for them is probably $0.

I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt before saying the same thing.

I have never had a problem with wiring money out of IB. Was there something special in your instance which delayed the process?

Cry me a river. Here is the deal: you and flytiger talk the same party line and neither can answer my question. You deflect attention from what I am saying and you resort to insulting me when everything else fails.

I never said it was right and you continue to avoid my fundamental question.