Search results

A call to Tech Support on Monday should set everything straight. Since you've reloaded the PVfiles, double check to ensure the correct contracts remains inside the STR-SQU Function. - Spydertrader

Not even close. The market has indicated well before 11:05 what must come next, and it did. (All times Eastern and [close of] ES bar.) - Spydertrader

You may need to go back to the function and 'verify' the new setting by clicking the button of the same name. Functions which require verification should be titled in red. - Spydertrader

Not according to my chart. As to what your chart might say, I do not know, as I have not seen it. Because the market did not yet arrive at Point Two. - Spydertrader

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2198460>

I cannot read your mind. However, if you do not see that sequences always complete, if you cannot see that a Point Three always forms, if you cannot always know the 'right side of the market,' then I recommend a review of Monitoring until you can see the above. - Spydertrader

Someone else had already provided the answer to your question. - Spydertrader

For those of you trading Equities, keep in mind the half day on Friday (1 PM Close), and the subsequent effect on Dry Up calculations for Monday. Futures Traders need to recognize the early close (1:15 PM) on Friday as well. (All times Eastern) - Spydertrader

Happy Thanksgiving to those in the US, and to those outside the United States, Happy Ordinary Thursday. The paradigm used (not many futures traders posting in the P&L Thread) isn't going to provide the satisfaction you seek for several very important reasons. First, very few actual traders...

This is exactly what I have been saying for quite some time now. One only requires sufficient brain power to follow directions. No more. Start with these instructions ... Create thoroughly annotated charts. Fixed it for you. - Spydertrader

No. I provided one way a trader can know for this specific example. I did not provide all the ways a trader should have known for this example. Nor did I provide the way a trader must know for every example. In other words, the answer doesn't represent the important part of the equation...

From dictionary.com ... driv&#8901;el&#8194; &#8194;/&#712;dr&#618;v&#601;l/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [driv-uhl] 2. childish, silly, or meaningless talk or thinking; nonsense; twaddle. drib&#8901;ble&#8194; &#8194;/&#712;dr&#618;b&#601;l/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [drib-uhl]...

A sufficient data set exists to determine the market closed while moving in a non-dominant direction. Nothing More. All poodles are dogs, but not all dogs are poodles. - Spydertrader

1. You believe R2R developed by the 12:15 bar. 2. If so, then 12:20 must represent Point Two to Point Three. 3. If so, then 12:25 must represent Point Three (and into the channel). 4. If so, then surely the market showed a return to dominance. 5. Did it? 6. Review my previous...

Yes. And so can you. How does Price exit a formation (by default)? - Spydertrader

When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car. :D - Spydertrader

Even Harmonic represents another internal formation (similar to a Pennant). Correct annotation, with respect to internals often determines whether or not one has reached the sufficient data set required to take timely and appropriate action. - Spydertrader

Many already have the answer you seek, but they also have something else which you do not yet have. Those who have spent time differentiating the various questions posted throughout this thread understand the answers to be far less important than the process used to obtain the answers. Follow...

See Attached. - Spydertrader

I don't recall 'suggesting' anything in my post which would lead one to the conclusion rendered above. In order to drive this point home, I had yet to review Guavaman's chart, prior to, responding to your post. In the future, take care not to reach arbitrary conclusions. Understand what has...