Search results

"Change their minds... ego" is complete BS. We'd all be trading nickel ranges if that were true. Dime-store trading philo. Ego allows us to pull the trigger. >80% of mkt participation is professional. GOOG traded in 5% range on a stock split. So efficient. No greed, fear or ego involved in that...

Humble? That's my background. If you think I am FOS then I'll happily confirm it privately. I have a lot of experience in financial markets and never stop learning. He could've logged in and told me to F off. He can't do any damage to the account over the weekend. A dozen guys here know me...

BS. I offered him a look into my account last weekend to vet the trades he questioned (my GOOG long and ES short).

Eight days is noise. You can have a horrific R/R and still produce a nice gain. I've gone 30-40 trades hitting singles ($1 gain on a $10 debit for weeks and weeks). It doesn't make that specific method viable. Many methods are built on martingales; or achieving a high hit-rate while risking say...

My opinions and cynicism are rooted in long-experience. I left public-service to trade for two large sell-side firms before going out on my own 17 years ago. I've traded for three large HFs since 2000 ($150MM to billions in AUM). He's been calling people out with nothing to justify his opinion...

SIV66 does not go into detail on his method, but it's commonly-known what markets and general strategy he trades (curve-trades). I think he'll also admit I got him into it. I have spent 12 years going into detail on methodology. I have a "pitchfork" thread that goes into detail on a RV index...

I am stating, again, that the granularity is not necessary to produce the chart. Maybe we're simply not being clear.

That's the point. You can't deconstruct a bar (chart) into tick-data, and the complete tick-series is not a necessity in the production of a OHLC bar.

Absolutely not true. For example, Some services (and DMA front-ends) use a lookback to derive the OHLC as opposed to using a true tick-construction.

Wrong. You cannot deconstruct a bar chart into its constituent tick-data. It's derived, but not expressed (as tick data).

Well the decouplers work. Sides include gigantism, cardiomyopathy and death. (joking about the gigantism). Quick story/anecdote. I knew this SA bodybuilder from Cape Town. Huge guy, genetically. Came from a wealthy mining family and could get anything he wanted. Asked me to consult with him on...

Yeah, you're wrong. Two fools discussing "inputs" on the chart. The chart cannot be deconstructed into tick data unless it's a tick-chart.

Regardless, do you understand the distinction?

All legit traders talk like this.

With respect to r/t calls and claims? I did better than 10x risk in this thread and produced the blotter. Every trade reconciled and taken by multiple parties. So there is his answer. And no, I have not replicated 10x (or better) risk since. My PF is roughly 5 since that thread was closed (a...

Wow, baller! So you're comparing a severely capacity-constrained market to a liquid index futures contract? Cool story, bro.

I was on anabolicminds for a few years. All of these boards are moronic for the most part. I had a bit of a following so I would get the constant PMs. Can I party while on anadrol? Why aren't I gaining, etc. Guys taking gear and working out once a week. Really comical stuff.

Nobody in the history of this planet has had those numbers. Not even HFT.

Here's another trade that may appeal to NoDoji. I bought the GOOGL 620P. I was working 20 but got filled on one before the stock ran lower. A fcuking one lot and it's one more than your DBP acolytes have done today. And yes, it's the only thing I got done today as TWS is not quoting complexes on...