Search results

That may be the case in your world, but it hasn't been working out very well.

Several times a day, lately.

IOW, guessing. Whether it works out or not is irrelevant as there's no robust method behind it.

IOW, Guess&Hope. Not the preferred course for someone who wants to actually make a living at this.

As you keep saying. But entries without exits and exits without entries make the whole thing useless. Do you not have any concept of trade integrity?

I doubt any of the kids understand any of this, but some of us do. That's why I have to laugh at what they consider important, including these silly message board foodfights. If you are unaware of Tampa's old threads, you might enjoy them. I believe this was the first (Tampa had medical issues...

Now that would be the key to untold wealth. :D

Unfortunately, the market couldn't care less what you believe. Whether you have a robust system or not is determined by results. And your results are not only spotty but inconsistent. Hardly robust.

I've been at this a lot longer than you have, though when it comes to shills, you appear to have a great deal of first-hand knowledge.

Lots of people claim many things. What's their trading plan? Without that, it's nothing but pretty pictures which don't make a lot of sense.

Keep in mind also that after all these years ms has nothing better than Guess&Hope. So do you want to make money or do you want to follow somebody who can't even come up with a consistently-profitable trading plan?

No evasion. Given that your system pretty much sucks, you're hardly in a position to criticize anyone. Fix your system. Then get back to us.

All price action strategies "work" all the time. Whether they are consistently profitable or not depends on how they're implemented. Bones' post was directed toward those who seek certainty. There's nothing certain about the markets. And the inability to see reality is why you believe you're...

Or you can follow the advice of someone whose system self-admittedly only works "sometimes" and "isn't consistently profitable". Why doesn't he fix it? Because he doesn't know how.

Actually something is gained as buying too early means that you first have to dig yourself out of the hole before the account turns from red to black. Waiting pays, as long as one doesn't wait too long.

Teflon Jem.

Actually that's not what he's doing. He's buying stocks that are being sold. But nothing is lost by waiting for the turn as long as one knows when that is occurring.

But, as you probably know, I’m a lawyer. No, I didn't. But you very likely learned how to think, a skill that's in short supply. I can’t find any indication in your response about whether you buy into “measured moves”. I think that you do seem to buy into price targets based on supply and...

Don't know why we have to go through this yet again, but it's easier to copy-and-paste than retype: briana said that dbphoenix said: TA is not the use of past price and volume to make predictions about future price. TA is the study of price behavior. What the trader does as a result of that...

Something with a float, particularly a small float, is more susceptible to this sort of manipulation. Something like MSFT or AAPL is less susceptible. As for the A/D volume characteristics, you have the material, though you may have forgotten. Email me if you can't remember.