Search results

The stock is in a downtrend. How long? Is it going to be in a downtrend? Nobody knows... 5 minutes, 5 years?

I usually look for the low volume, high spread symbols... if you want high volume, low spread, try the London Exchange... the big names like brittish petroleum and vodaphone move several hundred million shares per day

Just try not to touch any of the processes that belong to "system"

He didn't suggest that you trade the Shangai market, but and Japan, Korean... You can daytrade on those markets, as well as Singapur, India, Australia and New Zeland.

Hmm that's true, I've never noticed that NASDAQ's protocols have no cancel replace...

Sounds to me like they're not sending a cancel replace order, but rather a cancel and then a new order. If you use cancel replace, all the information [the new order and the info on the order to cancel] go in a single message. Here's some info from NYFIX Fixionary: http://fixionary.com/

He doesn't need to have anything to do with any attack. Look at Saddam, he had nothing to do with 911... yet Bush decided that he was the bad guy and took him out...

I was looking at a chart of the S&P against gold [basically the S&P with a gold standard... ] it's down 50% since july 2006... http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui $SPX:$GOLD It's a shame that it only goes back 3 years though....

great. i didn't even need to become a Member, I was able to get the chart for free :D

Where can I find charts of the S&P denominated in Euro's, Pounds, or gold?

I think the whole electoral college system is obsolete and unnecessary, given today's technology. You don't need to send guys to Washington representing each state to choose the president, you can have the results faxed or emailed. With this system a vote from a person in one state is worth...

I hear the French have developed new methods for disposing of billions in the market without any problematic side effects.

You have to say the name of "He who should not be named" 3 times to invoke him... PS Don't say it again!

Any system were someone gets 2,000,000 votes more than the other guy and still loses the election is not OK. The whole "electoral vote" system is a scheme to assure that only politicians get to choose the president and vice president. Making it nearly impossible for a third party to emerge.

What we're seeing is an intellectual battle between 2 economic schools... FED is behaving ina keynesian text book manner; and the ECB is bahaving in an Austrian Text book manner. I'm inclined towards the Austrian school, so I think that the European approach is the way to go. Only a fool...

Ohh yeah, that thing were the guy with the least votes gets to be president [appointed by the supreme court of course] If it happens overseas then it's a mock to democracy, and a dictatorship... if it happens in Washington, it's just business as usual.

You have a good point... it would be a much better tactic to learn how to write MM algorythms [learning a little C++ perhaps] than to try to beat computers at their own game... let's face it, no man can do 30,000 operations in 1 second... However, you might be taking your point a bit too...

Go trade Euronext... no stock locate bs...

Hmm... interesting... so the concept of flat tax isn't that new...

lol.... nice way to bring the thread back on track. ;)