Search results

This is just a software bug that has to be reported to Oanda. Because the functionality the way it's now accordig to what you are saying does not make any sense. That's all.

Below 1 to 1? What do you mean?

I don't see any edge for Israel in a conventional army standoff with Hizbolah. Why they couldn't just snatch few Hizbolah operatives? This should be a war of special forces and intelligent services. This is a war of brains not muscules. Although I also believe that the continuing border...

The best thing would be if Hizbolah abides by UN resolution and disarms itself.

Any country has the right to respond violently to the act of violance when attacked with rockets and its sovereignty is violated. Any country acts in its own best interests. Too bad if they do not match your ideas of how it should have been reacted to the act of agression. I wonder why you do...

It will pressure government of Lebanon to take matters into their own hands & finally deal with Hizbolah which acts as Iranian proxy in Lebanon. After all government of Lebanon ( ant not any other government) has first hand obligations to its own people to garantee their stability & security.

There is nothing one can do to appease terrorism.

I would fight it with robots.

Terrorism is similar to a cancer desease when the young cells that are agressive by its nature because of their faster metabolism which are only consuming energy to sustain their growth and are multplying rapidly and in the end they are replacing the mature & properly functioning cells so this...

I don't know what you are trying to say but world's stability is all about balance of powers ( plus democracy that is also a major contributor to stability ) . So yes, terror should be fought back with anti-terror.

It's interesting that all those demagogues who brand Israeli response as unproportional they know what the unproportional response is but nobody can define a proportional response. It goes lbasically ike that: "I don't know what a proportional response should be but Israeli response is...

Thankfully talking trash on the internet carries no risk of being headbutted in the chest.

I totally agree with you. The laws that cannot be enforced are worth not more than a piece of paper they are written on. And a modern terrorism is a product of UN since criminal nations just found the way to circumvent those laws through all kind of proxies that are not part of UN.

In this case here are another racist states for you: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Japan, China, North Korea, Vietnam etc.

The Palestinian people have elected government and in civilised world this is a government's responsibility to garantee the safe life & decent living of the common people. They should think about feeding their people first instead engaging in those cross-border provocations against the...

Your considerations do not apply to the nations, national interests and national security. In order to bring the nation to court one should overcome it first. As it happened in Iraq. Or with Germany in WW2. That's the major the problem with UN. It tryes to impose the legal laws on nations but...

Cold war was a good example of a balanced warfare garanteed by the mutual annihilation. That's why I frankly don't understand why Israel can't kidnap few hizbolah soldiers and trade them for Israelis. Hizbolah uses special forces for their operations. Why Israel can not do the same instead of...

Military sends clear signals to those who direct policies on the other side. Anyway when it comes down to using military force I don't understand the notion of proportionality. Never read of it in history books. They say in the book: a la guerr come al guerra.

There is no such thing as proportion in military dictionary - enemy sould be overpowered. Period. One can argue that kidnapping of a sleeping soldier is out of proportion too. Proportion is a political term. What should be a proportional response?

What's a big deal if isr would chase some scum around & teach them a good lesson.