Search results

the President like his main constituents, the welfare class and government workers are a bunch of city slickers who believe that food arrives at your breakfast table by dropping like manna from heaven: https://www.yahoo.com/politics/farmer-visited-by-obama-is-now-the-face-of-125535895256.html.

sarao is in jail because he is a nobody. to imply otherwise is not logical. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11556372/Flash-Crash-trader-Navinder-Singh-Sarao-a-prankster-who-always-got-away-with-it-friends-say.html)...

of course. it is not the sword but the swordsman.

it did not meet the first condition of an unexpected event based upon the past. a black swan event is not defined as an outsized move. the size of the move is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for defining a black swan event e.g. a company's drug fails a phase 3 trlal and drops 75%...

It did not meet the definition of a black swan event. "First, it is an outlier, as it lies outside the realm of regular expectations, because nothing in the past can convincingly point to its possibility. Second, it carries an extreme 'impact'. Third, in spite of its outlier status, human nature...

http://www.businessinsider.com/switzerlands-central-bank-lost-51-billion-and-the-franc-crashed-04-2015-7

thanks for info.

not everybody follow a subject on twitter. the post is a good introduction. add comment if you deem it of importance. it is a shade of left wing countries. government authorities can't stand criticism or the light of the day.

control your temper before someone controls it for you.

your attempts to insult prove that you are a not literary master.

your reference is not fully self explanatory plus your addition of a throwaway line is what it is. can we expect more in the future?

again you faded by deflecting the answer like a prototype snake oil salesman. to say look it up as it is in every basic economic text is because you don't have the answer. the fact that refused to answer me directly is part of your lack of character and your general deceitful nature.

you still didn't answer the question concerning what is the difference between printing money and bond buying by a central bank. you can dance all you want with your responses but when it comes to a factual answer you fade. does anybody see a difference?

you still didn't answer the question concerning the difference between printing money and bond buying by a central bank. you can dance all you want with your responses but when it comes to a factual answer you fade.

you hit on the definition of a true edge. you can explain it to someone else and whatever the reason may be ( it can be many things) they cannot duplicate it.

start your own thread.

never happened.

present piezoe with a question that requires a factual response and he is nowhere to be heard. "what is the difference?" it is all a camouflage to hide his true beliefs that he a soft money communist. of course, in his mind communism never existed in the soviet union because it did not fit his...

isn't there a risk that the federal reserve can do a reorganization and cancel the certificate and you lose the asset. it happens in russia all the time. the US is headed toward the same slippery slope where the validity of contracts is rarely upheld when it affects the most powerful.

what is the difference?